International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 6 (June 2024), Pages: 205-214

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Teachers' role in implementing the Somali primary school curriculum in Mogadishu, Somalia

 Author(s): 

 Abdirahman Ibrahim Abdi *, Mohamed Osman Abdi Idris

 Affiliation(s):

 Faculty of Education, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2935-7510

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.06.022

 Abstract

This study investigated the key factors influencing teachers' roles in implementing the primary curriculum in Mogadishu, Somalia. It explored the impact of Teacher Training and Qualifications (TTQ), Resource and Support (RS), and School Leadership and Culture (SLC) on Teacher Motivation (M) and its role in curriculum execution. A probability sampling method was used to select a representative sample of 322 teachers from a population of 2000, ensuring a broad perspective. The research employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via the SEMinR software for analysis, supplemented by descriptive statistics to summarize the data. The analysis aimed to validate the measures, distinguish between constructs, and test the developed hypotheses. The results confirmed the significance of TTQ, RS, SLC, and Teacher Motivation in curriculum implementation, rejecting the null hypotheses with p-values significantly below the 0.05 threshold. The findings underscore the necessity of enhancing teacher training, resource provision, leadership, and motivation to improve curriculum implementation and educational quality.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Curriculum implementation, Teacher training and qualifications, Resources and support, School leadership and culture, Teacher motivation

 Article history

 Received 9 February 2024, Received in revised form 8 June 2024, Accepted 11 June 2024

 Acknowledgment 

The authors would like to thank SIMAD University for its encouragement and kind financial assistance in carrying out this research study. We also want to thank everyone who made the effort to help us gather accurate data from Mogadishu Secondary School.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and their confidentiality was strictly maintained.

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Abdi AI and Idris MOA (2024). Teachers' role in implementing the Somali primary school curriculum in Mogadishu, Somalia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(6): 205-214

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5

----------------------------------------------   

 References (41)

  1. Abdullahi HO, Mohamud AH, Ali AF, and Hassan AA (2023). Determinants of the intention to use information system: A case of SIMAD University in Mogadishu, Somalia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(4):188-196. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.04.023   [Google Scholar]
  2. Alek R, Fitria H, and Eddy S (2021). The role of teachers in implementing curriculum 13 in primary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1): 2270-2274. https://doi.org/10.29210/021043jpgi0005   [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali AF, Hassan AA, Abdullahi HO, and Abdulah RH (2023). Analyzing the factors influencing the adoption of cloud computing by SMEs using the SEM approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(7): 66-79. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.07.009   [Google Scholar]
  4. Alsubaie MA (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9): 106-107.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Altrichter H (2005). Curriculum implementation–limiting and facilitating factors. In: Nentwig P and Waddington D (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context based learning of science: 35-62. Waxmann Verlag, Münster, Germany.   [Google Scholar]
  6. Arif S, Asghar Z, and Mukhtar S (2020). Interactive effect of school principals’ leadership styles and teacher characteristics on curriculum implementation at public secondary schools of Punjab. UMT Education Review, 3(1): 95-119. https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.31.05   [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagozzi RP and Yi Y (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40: 8-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x   [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosso D (2017). Teacher morale, motivation and professional identity: Insight for educational policymakers from state teachers of the year. Teacher Researcher Policy Paper Series, National Network of State Teachers of the Year, Philadelphia, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaudhary GK (2015). Factors affecting curriculum implementation for students. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(12): 984-986.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Dagnew A (2020). Teachers’ role in curriculum implementation at primary and secondary schools of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Contemporary Educational Research Journal, 10(2): 28-41. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v10i2.4660   [Google Scholar]
  11. Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104   [Google Scholar]
  12. Gunduz Y (2014). An examination of the factors that contribute to teacher candidates’ attitudes towards teaching profession in various aspects. The Anthropologist, 18(3): 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891612   [Google Scholar]
  13. Hair JF, Howard MC, and Nitzl C (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069   [Google Scholar]
  14. Hair JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, and Sarstedt M (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2): 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574   [Google Scholar]
  15. Hair JF, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202   [Google Scholar]
  16. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, and Ringle CM (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1): 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203   [Google Scholar]
  17. Imron A, Wiyono BB, Hadi S, Gunawan I, Abbas A, Saputra BR, and Perdana DB (2020). Teacher professional development to increase teacher commitment in the era of the ASEAN economic community. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 487: 339-343. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211210.008   [Google Scholar]
  18. Ireh M and Ibeneme OT (2010). Differentiating instruction to meet the needs of diverse technical/technology education students at the secondary school level. African Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1): 106-114. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v1i1.1581   [Google Scholar]
  19. Jabal E (2006). Learning from Hong Kong alumni: Lessons for school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(1): 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120500483672   [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaya E (2019). Investigation of teacher candidates' competence perception and attitude towards teaching. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(4): 531-537. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.54.531.537   [Google Scholar]
  21. Kazi AS and Akhlaq A (2017). Factors affecting students’ career choice. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 2(2): 187-196.   [Google Scholar]
  22. Leithwood K and Sun J (2018). Academic culture: A promising mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3): 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0009   [Google Scholar]
  23. Mark O and David W (2020). Motivation and teachers commitment in public primary schools in Kakooge sub-county, Nakasongola District, Uganda. Multidisciplinary Research Academic Journal, 5(1): 31-39.   [Google Scholar]
  24. Meng H (2022). Analysis of the relationship between transformational leadership and educational management in higher education based on deep learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022: 5287922. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5287922   [Google Scholar] PMid:35755724 PMCid:PMC9217561
  25. Mogashoa T (2021). Teachers’ understandings of the implementation of the curriculum and assessment policy statement in secondary schools. Ilkogretim Online, 20(6): 1507-1521.   [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohamed MJ and Hassan SA (2023). Studying the factors that influence the adoption of educational technology in Mogadishu secondary schools using UTAUT model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(7): 1070-1077. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.7.1906   [Google Scholar]
  27. Munna AS and Kalam MA (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102   [Google Scholar]
  28. Nevenglosky EA (2018). Barriers to effective curriculum implementation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  29. Obilor EI (2019). Feedback and students' learning. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 7(2): 40-47.   [Google Scholar]
  30. Oğuz E and Kalkan M (2011). Examining teacher candidates' attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3): 903-917.   [Google Scholar]
  31. Oliver RM and Reschly DJ (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. TQ Connection Issue Paper, National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, Washington, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Oteng B, Mensah RO, Adiza Babah P, and Swanzy-Impraim E (2023). Social studies and history curriculum assessment in colleges of education in Ghana: Reflective practices of teacher educators. Cogent Education, 10(1): 2175515. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2175515   [Google Scholar]
  33. Pelletier LG, Séguin-Lévesque C, and Legault L (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1): 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.186   [Google Scholar]
  34. Pineda H (2023). Stakeholders' perceptions of the impact of accreditation of science curricula of higher education institutions. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(7): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.07.001   [Google Scholar]
  35. Qureshi MA, Khaskheli A, Qureshi JA, Raza SA, and Yousufi SQ (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4): 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886   [Google Scholar]
  36. Saleh B, Arafat Y, and Putra AY (2021). The role of teachers in implementing curriculum 13 in primary schools. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 565: 869-872. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210716.171   [Google Scholar]
  37. Shohel MCM and Banks F (2012). School-based teachers’ professional development through technology-enhanced learning in Bangladesh. Teacher Development, 16(1): 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.668103   [Google Scholar]
  38. Urhahne D and Wijnia L (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35: 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9   [Google Scholar]
  39. Wan SWY, Law EHF, and Chan KK (2018). Teachers’ perception of distributed leadership in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 38(1): 102-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1371689   [Google Scholar]
  40. Yan XQ, Zhou YY, Zhang K, and Cui GY (2023). Perceived teacher enthusiasm and professional commitment: The mediating role of boredom and learning engagement. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16: 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S400137   [Google Scholar] PMid:37069921 PMCid:PMC10105573
  41. Yatun Y, Munir A, and Retnaningdyah P (2021). Teachers’ TPACK practice of English blended learning course in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistic, English Education and Art Journal, 5(1): 19-38. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v5i1.2754   [Google Scholar]