International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 6 (June 2024), Pages: 147-155

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Significant and substantial opportunities to improve distributive justice and perceived organizational support

 Author(s): 

 R. Joko Sugiharjo 1, *, Eri Marlapa 1, Paijan Paijan 1, Rr. Niken Purbasari 2, Ryani Dhyan Parasakti 3, Mochamad Soelton 1

 Affiliation(s):

 1Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
 2Management Department, STIE Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
 3Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Dian Nusantara, Jakarta, Indonesia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9564-716X

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.06.016

 Abstract

The effectiveness of a company in achieving its objectives relies not only on technology, financial resources, and infrastructure but also on its human resources. This requires companies to operate in a more efficient, effective, and productive manner. In highly competitive environments, companies can ensure their survival by focusing on human resources management. This study aims to examine the impact of Distributive Justice (DJ) and Perceived Organizational Support (POS) on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), both directly and indirectly through Organizational Learning (OL), within digital printing supplier companies. A total of 117 employees participated in this study, which employed a quantitative approach using questionnaires. The Structural Equation Model (SEM) and Smart-PLS were used for data analysis. The findings indicate that DJ and POS both positively influence OCB and OL. However, OL does not mediate the relationship between DJ or POS and OCB. A notable observation is that OL has not yet become essential for employees to enhance organizational performance or play a significant role in creating opportunities and adapting to the business environment.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Distributive justice, Perceived organizational support, Organizational citizenship behavior, Organizational learning, Digital printing industry

 Article history

 Received 20 December 2023, Received in revised form 1 May 2024, Accepted 4 June 2024

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

This study adhered to ethical standards as per the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and their confidentiality was maintained. Ethical guidelines were followed according to the policies of Universitas Mercu Buana.

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Sugiharjo RJ, Marlapa E, Paijan P, Purbasari RN, Parasakti RD, and Soelton M (2024). Significant and substantial opportunities to improve distributive justice and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(6): 147-155

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3

----------------------------------------------   

 References (56)

  1. Arief H, Yuliantini T, Thoullon MS, Marlapa E, Soelton M, Karyatun S, and Humaidah SI (2023). Intimate servant leadership and transformational leadership improve organizational citizenship behavior. American International Journal of Business Management, 6(10): 6-16.   [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakely GL, Andrews MC, and Moorman RH (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2): 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-8263-3   [Google Scholar]
  3. Blau P (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643   [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne ZS and Hochwarter WA (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1): 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810849666   [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen ZX, Tsui AS, and Farh JL (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(3): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902320369749   [Google Scholar]
  6. Claudia M (2018). The influence of perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and organizational commitment toward organizational citizenship behavior (A study of the permanent lecturers at University of Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin). Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 33(1): 23-45. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.17761   [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen-Charash Y and Spector PE (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2): 278-321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958   [Google Scholar]
  8. Colquitt JA (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.386   [Google Scholar] PMid:11419799
  9. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, and Ng KY (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425   [Google Scholar] PMid:11419803
  10. Colquitt JA, Lepine JA, and Wesson MJ (2015). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, and Rupp DE (2001). Self-enhancement biases, laboratory experiments, George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and the increasingly crowded world of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2): 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1798   [Google Scholar]
  12. DeConink JB (2010). The effect of organizational justice perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees' level of trust. Journal of Business Research, 63(12): 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.01.003   [Google Scholar]
  13. Dekoulou P and Trivellas P (2014). Learning organization in Greek advertising and media industry: A way to face crisis and gain sustainable competitive advantage. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148: 338-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.051   [Google Scholar]
  14. Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski IL, and Rhoades L (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3): 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.565   [Google Scholar] PMid:12090614
  15. Hatfield RD, Turner JH, and Spiller S (2013). Altruism, reciprocity, and cynicism: A new model to conceptualize the attitudes which support prosocial behaviors. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 17(2): 159-165.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Henderson DJ, Liden RC, Glibkowski BC, and Chaudhry A (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4): 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003   [Google Scholar]
  17. Hong KK and Kim YG (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Information and Management, 40(1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00134-3   [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang K, Lepak DP, Han K, Hong Y, Kim A, and Winkler AL (2012). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.005   [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, and Adis CS (2015). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6): 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554   [Google Scholar]
  20. Ladebo OJ (2008). Perceived supervisory support and organizational citizenship behaviors: Is job satisfaction a mediator? South African Journal of Psychology, 38(3): 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630803800303   [Google Scholar]
  21. LePine JA, Erez A, and Johnson DE (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.52   [Google Scholar] PMid:11916216
  22. Lestari ER and Ghaby NKF (2018). Pengaruh organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) terhadap kepuasan kerja dan kinerja karyawan. Industria: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 7(2): 116-123. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2018.007.02.6   [Google Scholar]
  23. Linda MR, Yonita R, and Silvia ED (2019). The effect of perceived organizational support and job satisfaction on organizational citizenship behavior. In the 3rd Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship, Atlantis Press, Padang, Indonesia: 130-135. https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba-19.2019.76   [Google Scholar]
  24. Luthans F (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  25. Marsick VJ and Watkins KE (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2): 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002   [Google Scholar]
  26. Mathis RL and Jackson JH (2011). Human resource management. Salemba Empat, Jakarta, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
  27. Matin HZ, Jandaghi G, and Ahmadi F (2010). A comprehensive model for identifying factors impacting the development of organizational citizenship behavior. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10): 1932–1945.   [Google Scholar]
  28. McShane SL and Glinow MA (2015). Organizational behavior emerging knowledge, global reality. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  29. Mengue B (2000). An empirical investigation of a social exchange model of organizational citizenship behaviors across two Sales situations: A Turkish case. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 20(4): 205–214.   [Google Scholar]
  30. Neves P and Caetano A (2006). Social exchange processes in organizational change: The roles of trust and control. Journal of Change Management, 6(4): 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010601054008   [Google Scholar]
  31. Newstorm JW (2011). Organizational behavior: Human behavior: At work. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Ng TW, Sorensen KL, and Eby LT (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8): 1057–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.416   [Google Scholar]
  33. Nuzula IF and Nurmaya E (2020). The influence of distributive justice, job satisfaction and affective commitment to organizational citizenship behavior. Revista Produção E Desenvolvimento, 6: e464. https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2020.v6.464   [Google Scholar]
  34. Organ DW, Podsakoff PM, and McKenzie SM (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior. SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  35. Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R, Maitlis S, Robinson DL, and Wallace AM (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4): 379-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.312   [Google Scholar]
  36. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, and Bachrach DG (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307   [Google Scholar]
  37. Rhoades L and Eisenberger R (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698   [Google Scholar] PMid:12184574
  38. Rifai HA (2005). A test of the relationships among perceptions of justice, job satisfaction, affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(2): 131-154. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5574   [Google Scholar]
  39. Robbins SP and Judge T (2013). Organizational behavior: Concept, controversies, and application. Prentice Hall, Hoboken, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  40. Rohman F, Noermijati N, Mugiono M, and Soelton M (2023). The role of quality assurance in improving the distribution of organizational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1): 237-248. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.003   [Google Scholar]
  41. Rupp DE and Cropanzano R (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifocal organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1): 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5   [Google Scholar]
  42. Samuel A, Budhwar PS, and Chen CZ (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.138   [Google Scholar]
  43. Senge PM (2010). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Crown Publishing Group, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  44. Skarlicki DP, van Jaarsveld DD, Shao R, Song YH, and Wang M (2016). Extending the multifocal perspective: The role of supervisor justice and moral identity in the relationship between customer justice and customer-directed sabotage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1): 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000034   [Google Scholar] PMid:26052713
  45. Soelton M (2023). Conceptualizing organizational citizenship behavior and learning organization in the labor sector. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen, 19(1): 239-255. https://doi.org/10.33830/jom.v19i1.4067.2023   [Google Scholar]
  46. Soelton M and Nugrahati T (2018). How complaining behaviors effect on coping stress and anxiety. International Journal of Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies (SJBMS), 3(6): 623-628.   [Google Scholar]
  47. Soelton M, Marta P, Thoullon MS, Yuliantini T, Saratian ET P, and Arief H (2023). The knowledge sharing anomaly to improve organizational citizenship behavior. WSEAS Transactions on Financial Engineering, 1: 326-344. https://doi.org/10.37394/232032.2023.1.31   [Google Scholar]
  48. Soelton M, Noermijati N, Rohman F, Mugiono M, Aulia I, and Siregar R (2020). Reawakening perceived person organization fit and perceived person job fit: Removing obstacles organizational commitment. Management Science Letters, 10(13): 2993-3002. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.5.026   [Google Scholar]
  49. Spector PE and Fox S (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2): 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9   [Google Scholar]
  50. Steiger JH (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5): 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017   [Google Scholar]
  51. Tepper BJ, Duffy MK, Hoobler J, and Ensley MD (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers' organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455   [Google Scholar] PMid:15161405
  52. Van Dyne L, Vandewalle D, Kostova T, Latham ME, and Cummings LL (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1<3::AID-JOB47>3.0.CO;2-6   [Google Scholar]
  53. Wong YT, Ngo HY, and Wong CS (2006). Perceived organizational justice, trust, and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41(4): 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.003   [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang J, Mossholder KW, and Peng TK (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.009   [Google Scholar]
  55. Yilmaz F (2020). Relationship between distributive justice and organizational citizenship behavior in service businesses. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1): 438-457.   [Google Scholar]
  56. Zellars KL, Tepper BJ, and Duffy MK (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6): 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068   [Google Scholar] PMid:12558214