International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 6 (June 2024), Pages: 21-36

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Factors influencing innovative work behavior among local government employees in Labuan Batu

 Author(s): 

 Salman Faris 1, *, Syaifuddin Syaifuddin 1, Rusiadi Rusiadi 2

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Economics, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
 2Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6574-4316

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.06.003

 Abstract

Government employees are vital for delivering services to people, particularly within the Labuhan Batu Local Government. There's a strong need for workers who display innovative behavior to foster public trust. Stakeholders must be deeply committed to improving the quality of employees' work. This study aims to understand how innovative work behavior is affected by factors like professional identity, leadership humility, work ethic, strategies for managing human resources, and job satisfaction. Research on how job satisfaction influences innovative work behavior, considering professional identity, leadership humility, work ethic, and human resource strategies, is scarce. The main purpose of this research is to see how job satisfaction can boost innovative work behavior among employees in the Labuhan Batu Local Government. It uses a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach with Partial Least Squares (PLS) to analyze the data. Data was collected through surveys from 372 permanent staff members in Labuhan Batu. Findings show that job satisfaction is crucial, both directly and indirectly, in linking leadership humility, work ethic, and human resources strategies with innovative work behavior. However, professional identity doesn't significantly affect job satisfaction or innovative work behavior. The study's limitation is its narrow focus on government employees. Future studies should broaden the participant pool and include private sector workers to better understand the impact of professional identity on job satisfaction and innovation at work.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Innovative work behavior, Job satisfaction, Professional identity, Leadership humility, Human capital strategy

 Article history

 Received 17 October 2023, Received in revised form 6 March 2024, Accepted 21 May 2024

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guidelines. Prior to data collection, all participants were informed about the purpose of the study, their voluntary participation, and their right to withdraw at any time without any penalty. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The confidentiality and anonymity of the participants were maintained throughout the research process. Additionally, this study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Universitas Prima Indonesia.

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Faris S, Syaifuddin S, and Rusiadi R (2024). Factors influencing innovative work behavior among local government employees in Labuan Batu. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(6): 21-36

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (92)

  1. Abid SK, Rafique N, and Raza M (2023). Leadership styles impacting innovative work behavior with moderating role of job satisfaction. Sciences, 10(1): 41-56. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.2310103   [Google Scholar]
  2. Achmadi A, Hendryadi H, Oktrivina A, and Iskandar DA (2023). Investigating the effect of leader humility on innovative work behavior: The role of civility climate and job insecurity. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 38(1): 109-128. https://doi.org/10.56444/mem.v38i1.3400   [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad N, Scholz M, Arshad MZ, Jafri SKA, Sabir RI, Khan WA, and Han H (2021). The inter-relation of corporate social responsibility at employee level, servant leadership, and innovative work behavior in the time of crisis from the healthcare sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9): 4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094608   [Google Scholar] PMid:33925322 PMCid:PMC8123573
  4. Aini N, Nasution AP, and Siregar NA (2022). The effect of work environment, work ethics, work culture, and work motivation on performance of environmental services in Labuhanbatu Regency. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 3(5): 714-720. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems1061   [Google Scholar]
  5. Akram T, Lei S, Haider MJ, and Hussain ST (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(2): 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001   [Google Scholar]
  6. Alfawaire F and Atan T (2021). The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability, 13(15): 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158445   [Google Scholar]
  7. Ali M, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zada M, Begum A, Han H, Ariza-Montes A, and Vega-Muñoz A (2021). Can leaders’ humility enhance project management effectiveness? Interactive effect of top management support. Sustainability, 13(17): 9526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179526   [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Nashash HM, Panigrahi SK, and Darun MR (2018). Do work ethics improves employee job satisfaction? Insights from Jordanian banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11): 627-645. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i11/4936   [Google Scholar]
  9. Alolayyan MN, Alyahya MS, and Omari DA (2021). Strategic human resource management practices and human capital development: The role of employee commitment. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2): 157-169. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.13   [Google Scholar]
  10. Alqudah IH, Carballo-Penela A, and Ruzo-Sanmartín E (2022). High-performance human resource management practices and readiness for change: An integrative model including affective commitment, employees’ performance, and the moderating role of hierarchy culture. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1): 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100177   [Google Scholar]
  11. Alsafadi Y and Altahat S (2021). Human resource management practices and employee performance: The role of job satisfaction. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1): 519-529.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Baig LD, Azeem MF, and Paracha A (2022). Cultivating innovative work behavior of nurses through diversity climate: The mediating role of job crafting. SAGE Open Nursing, 8: 237796082210954. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221095432   [Google Scholar] PMid:35574269 PMCid:PMC9096180
  13. Bakotić D and Bulog I (2021). Organizational justice and leadership behavior orientation as predictors of employees job satisfaction: Evidence from Croatia. Sustainability, 13(19): 10569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910569   [Google Scholar]
  14. Bharanitharan DK, Lowe KB, Bahmannia S, Chen ZX, and Cui L (2021). Seeing is not believing: Leader humility, hypocrisy, and their impact on followers' behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2): 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101440   [Google Scholar]
  15. Bilal M, Chaudhry S, Amber H, Shahid M, Aslam S, and Shahzad K (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ proactive behaviour: Fortifying self determination theory. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3): 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030176   [Google Scholar] PMCid:PMC9906487
  16. Cahyadi A, Poór J, and Szabó K (2022). Pursuing consultant performance: The roles of sustainable leadership styles, sustainable human resource management practices, and consultant job satisfaction. Sustainability, 14(7): 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073967   [Google Scholar]
  17. Casu G, Mariani MG, Chiesa R, Guglielmi D, and Gremigni P (2021). The role of organizational citizenship behavior and gender between job satisfaction and task performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18): 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189499   [Google Scholar] PMid:34574423 PMCid:PMC8469399
  18. Chen H, Liu F, Pang L, Liu F, Fang T, Wen Y, Chen S, Xie Z, Zhang X, Zhao Y, and Gu X (2020). Are you tired of working amid the pandemic? The role of professional identity and job satisfaction against job burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24): 9188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249188   [Google Scholar] PMid:33316964 PMCid:PMC7764790
  19. Choudhary S, Memon NZ, and Mishra K (2020). Examining the influence of human capital on employees’ innovative work behaviour: A moderated serial mediation model. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 7(2): 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093720942660   [Google Scholar]
  20. Elrehail H, Harazneh I, Abuhjeeleh M, Alzghoul A, Alnajdawi S, and Ibrahim HM (2019). Employee satisfaction, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: The case of Northern Cyprus. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 29(2): 125-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-01-2019-0001   [Google Scholar]
  21. Elstad B and Jansson D (2020). From artist to manager—Working conditions, career satisfaction, and professional identity among graduated arts management students. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 50(3): 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2020.1746717   [Google Scholar]
  22. Freire C and Pieta P (2022). The impact of green human resource management on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Sustainability, 14(13): 7557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137557   [Google Scholar]
  23. Gadomska-Lila K and Rogozińska-Pawełczyk A (2021). The role of pro-innovative HR practices and psychological contract in shaping employee commitment and satisfaction: A case from the energy industry. Energies, 15(1): 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010255   [Google Scholar]
  24. Gkontelos A, Vaiopoulou J, and Stamovlasis D (2022). Teachers’ innovative work behavior scale: psychometric properties of the Greek version and measurement invariance across genders. Social Sciences, 11(7): 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070306   [Google Scholar]
  25. Goetz N and Wald A (2022). Similar but different? The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and person-job fit on individual performance in the continuum between permanent and temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3): 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.001   [Google Scholar]
  26. González-González T and García-Almeida DJ (2021). Frontline employee-driven innovation through suggestions in hospitality firms: The role of the employee’s creativity, knowledge, and motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94: 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102877   [Google Scholar]
  27. Haldorai K, Kim WG, and Garcia RF (2022). Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: The mediating role of green human resource management. Tourism Management, 88: 104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104431   [Google Scholar]
  28. Han X, Xu Q, and Xiao J (2022). The influence of school atmosphere on Chinese teachers’ job satisfaction: The chain mediating effect of psychological capital and professional identity. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010001   [Google Scholar] PMid:36661573 PMCid:PMC9854419
  29. Haque AU and Yamoah FA (2021). The role of ethical leadership in managing occupational stress to promote innovative work behaviour: A cross-cultural management perspective. Sustainability, 13(17): 9608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179608   [Google Scholar]
  30. Hassanein F and Özgit H (2022). Sustaining human resources through talent management strategies and employee engagement in the Middle East hotel industry. Sustainability, 14(22): 15365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215365   [Google Scholar]
  31. Işık C, Aydın E, Dogru T, Rehman A, Alvarado R, Ahmad M, and Irfan M (2021). The nexus between team culture, innovative work behaviour and tacit knowledge sharing: Theory and evidence. Sustainability, 13(8): 4333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084333   [Google Scholar]
  32. Jankelová N, Joniaková Z, and Mišún J (2021). Innovative work behavior—A key factor in business performance? The role of team cognitive diversity and teamwork climate in this relationship. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4): 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040185   [Google Scholar]
  33. Javed B, Bashir S, Rawwas MY, and Arjoon S (2017). Islamic work ethic, innovative work behaviour, and adaptive performance: The mediating mechanism and an interacting effect. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6): 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1171830   [Google Scholar]
  34. Jia K, Zhu T, Zhang W, Rasool SF, Asghar A, and Chin T (2022). The linkage between ethical leadership, well-being, work engagement, and innovative work behavior: The empirical evidence from the higher education sector of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9): 5414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095414   [Google Scholar] PMid:35564809 PMCid:PMC9099872
  35. Jiang H, Wang Y, Chui E, and Xu Y (2019). Professional identity and turnover intentions of social workers in Beijing, China: The roles of job satisfaction and agency type. International Social Work, 62(1): 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817712564   [Google Scholar]
  36. Jung Y and Takeuchi N (2018). A lifespan perspective for understanding career self-management and satisfaction: The role of developmental human resource practices and organizational support. Human Relations, 71(1): 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717715075   [Google Scholar]
  37. Karimi S, Ahmadi Malek F, Yaghoubi Farani A, and Liobikienė G (2023). The role of transformational leadership in developing innovative work behaviors: The mediating role of employees’ psychological capital. Sustainability, 15(2): 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021267   [Google Scholar]
  38. Khorakian A, Mohammadi Shahroodi H, Jahangir M, and Nikkhah Farkhani Z (2019). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: The roles of ethical and knowledge sharing behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2): 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1607444   [Google Scholar]
  39. Kör B, Wakkee I, and van der Sijde P (2021). How to promote managers’ innovative behavior at work: Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation, 99: 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102127   [Google Scholar]
  40. Kosec Z, Sekulic S, Wilson-Gahan S, Rostohar K, Tusak M, and Bon M (2022). Correlation between employee performance, well-being, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction in sedentary jobs in Slovenian enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16): 10427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610427   [Google Scholar] PMid:36012060 PMCid:PMC9408039
  41. Kusasti RB and Usman M (2022). Pengaruh professional identity terhadap turonver intention yang dimediasi oleh employee engagement dan job satisfaction pada karyawan PT. telkom Indonesia di kota banda aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen, 7(2): 297-318.   [Google Scholar]
  42. Kutieshat R and Farmanesh P (2022). The impact of new human resource management practices on innovation performance during the COVID 19 crisis: A new perception on enhancing the educational sector. Sustainability, 14(5): 2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052872   [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee BR (2021). The relationship between the professionalism perception and the turnover intention of employees in welfare centers for the disabled: Focused on the mediating effect of the self-efficacy. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 12(8): 287-293. https://doi.org/10.20496/cpew.2021.8.3.107   [Google Scholar]
  44. Lei S, Peng L, and Guo Y (2023). Investigating the effect of leader humility on subordinates’ service creativity: A moderated dual path model. Current Psychology, 42(7): 5672-5684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01887-1   [Google Scholar]
  45. Li W, Gill SA, Wang Y, Safdar MA, and Sheikh MR (2022). Proactive personality and innovative work behavior: Through the juxtapose of Schumpeter’s theory of innovation and broaden-and-build theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 927458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927458   [Google Scholar] PMid:35769763 PMCid:PMC9236154
  46. Liborius P and Kiewitz C (2022). When leader humility meets follower competitiveness: Relationships with follower affective trust, intended and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 135: 103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103719   [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu H, Ahmed SJ, Kakar AS, and Durrani DK (2023). Creative performance and conflict through the lens of humble leadership: Testing a moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6): 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060483   [Google Scholar] PMid:37366735 PMCid:PMC10294780
  48. Lu M H, Luo J, Chen W, and Wang MC (2019). The influence of job satisfaction on the relationship between professional identity and burnout: A study of student teachers in Western China. Current Psychology, 41: 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00565-7   [Google Scholar]
  49. Mahendri MR, Susita D, and Yohana C (2022). The effect of servant leadership on innovative work behavior with psychological empowerment and job crafting as intervening variables. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2): 197-214.   [Google Scholar]
  50. Miao R, Lu L, Cao Y, and Du Q (2020). The high-performance work system, employee voice, and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4): 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041150   [Google Scholar] PMid:32059559 PMCid:PMC7068291
  51. Naeem A and Rashid M (2023). The effect of Islamic work ethics on employee performance and counterproductive work behavior: Examining the role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Business Reflections, 3(2): 227–263. https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.35   [Google Scholar]
  52. Na-Nan K, Kanthong S, and Joungtrakul J (2021). An empirical study on the model of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior transmitted through employee engagement, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the Thai automobile parts manufacturing industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3): 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030170   [Google Scholar]
  53. Nasib SB (2023). Organizational justice and corporate social responsibility on employee performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 10(3): 151-165. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2023.0312   [Google Scholar]
  54. Nasution NR, Siregar ZME, and Pristiyono P (2021). The effect of job autonomy on employee innovative behavior: The role of job satisfaction as intervening variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(2): 2846-2853. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1994   [Google Scholar]
  55. Nauman S, Zheng C, and Basit AA (2021). How despotic leadership jeopardizes employees' performance: The roles of quality of work life and work withdrawal. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0476   [Google Scholar]
  56. Nguyen NTT, Nguyen NP, and Hoai TT (2021). Ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: A serial mediation model. Heliyon, 7(4): e06809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06809   [Google Scholar] PMid:33898855 PMCid:PMC8060600
  57. Pham M (2020). The effect of professional identification and organizational identification on career satisfaction, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Management Science Letters, 10(11): 2683-2694. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.3.024   [Google Scholar]
  58. Purwanto A, Bernarto I, Asbari M, Wijayanti LM, and Hyun CC (2020). The impacts of leadership and culture on work performance in service company and innovative work behavior as mediating effects. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 2(1): 283-291. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v1i1.88   [Google Scholar]
  59. Purwanto A, Novitasari D, and Asbari M (2022). Tourist satisfaction and performance of tourism industries: How the role of innovative work behaviour, organizational citizenship behaviour? Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Research, 3(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v3i1.246   [Google Scholar]
  60. Qian X, Zhang M, and Jiang Q (2020). Leader humility, and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior and withdrawal behavior: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of subordinates’ psychological capital. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7): 2544. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072544   [Google Scholar] PMid:32276358 PMCid:PMC7178220
  61. Rafique MA, Hou Y, Chudhery MAZ, Waheed M, Zia T, and Chan F (2022). Investigating the impact of pandemic job stress and transformational leadership on innovative work behavior: The mediating and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(3): 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100214   [Google Scholar] PMCid:PMC9389552
  62. Rajak A, Thahrim M, and Pinoa M (2018). Pengaruh human capital dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai dinas lingkungan hidup kota ternate. Jurnal Manajemen Sinergi, 5(2): 1–20.   [Google Scholar]
  63. Rosdaniati R and Muafi M (2021). The influence of workplace happiness and innovative work behavior on job satisfaction mediated by work engagement. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(7): 186-198. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1457   [Google Scholar]
  64. Sabancıogullari S and Dogan S (2015). Effects of the professional identity development programme on the professional identity, job satisfaction and burnout levels of nurses: A pilot study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(6): 847-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12330   [Google Scholar] PMid:24779558
  65. Saleh R and Atan T (2021). The involvement of sustainable talent management practices on employee’s job satisfaction: Mediating effect of organizational culture. Sustainability, 13(23): 13320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313320   [Google Scholar]
  66. Sapada AFA, Modding HB, Gani A, and Nujum S (2018). The effect of organizational culture and work ethics on job satisfaction and employees performance. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 6(12): 28–36.   [Google Scholar]
  67. Shama SS and Ahmad GM (2021). The relationship between nurse's innovative work behavior and their job satisfaction. International Journal of Novel Research in Healthcare and Nursing, 8(1): 596-606.   [Google Scholar]
  68. Shoim M (2019). Pengaruh etika kerja islam terhadap komitmen organisasi dan kinerja dengan kepuasan kerja dan motivasi intrinsik sebagai pemediasi. Ph.D. Dissertation, STIE Perbanas Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
  69. Siegel R, König CJ, and Lazar V (2022). The impact of electronic monitoring on employees' job satisfaction, stress, performance, and counterproductive work behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8: 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100227   [Google Scholar]
  70. Singh K and Misra M (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) and organizational performance: The moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1): 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139   [Google Scholar]
  71. Singh N, Bamel U, and Vohra V (2021). The mediating effect of meaningful work between human resource practices and innovative work behavior: A study of emerging market. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(2): 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2020-0150   [Google Scholar]
  72. Sironi E (2019). Job satisfaction as a determinant of employees’ optimal well-being in an instrumental variable approach. Quality and Quantity, 53: 1721-1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00835-3   [Google Scholar]
  73. Skinner B, Leavey G, and Rothi D (2021). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 73(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1556205   [Google Scholar]
  74. Sudibjo N and Prameswari RK (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6): e07334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334   [Google Scholar] PMid:34195436 PMCid:PMC8239725
  75. Sun B, Zhu F, Lin S, Sun J, Wu Y, and Xiao W (2022). How is professional identity associated with teacher career satisfaction? A cross-sectional design to test the multiple mediating roles of psychological empowerment and work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15): 9009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159009   [Google Scholar] PMid:35897383 PMCid:PMC9332691
  76. Syahputra NF and Satrya A (2021). Relationship between work ethic and innovative work behavior mediated by person organization fit and intrinsic motivation on banking employees. In the 7th Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship, Atlantis Press, Padang, Indonesia: 501-507.   [Google Scholar]
  77. Syaifuddin S, Fajar RA, Yusniar L, and Nasib N (2022). Can life satisfaction become an important role in increasing employee performance? A case study. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 12(6): 379-397.   [Google Scholar]
  78. Tepayakul R and Rinthaisong I (2018). Job satisfaction and employee engagement among human resources staff of Thai private higher education institutions. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(2): 68-81.   [Google Scholar]
  79. Thielmann B, Schnell J, Böckelmann I, and Schumann H (2022). Analysis of work related factors, behavior, well-being outcome, and job satisfaction of workers of emergency medical service: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11): 6660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116660   [Google Scholar] PMid:35682241 PMCid:PMC9180048
  80. Tuan LT, Rowley C, Masli E, Le V, and Nhi LTP (2021). Nurturing service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior among tourism employees through leader humility. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46: 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.02.001   [Google Scholar]
  81. Udin U, Dananjoyo R, Shaikh M, and Vio Linarta D (2022). Islamic work ethics, affective commitment, and employee’s performance in family business: Testing their relationships. SAGE Open, 12(1): 21582440221085263. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085263   [Google Scholar]
  82. Volery T and Tarabashkina L (2021). The impact of organisational support, employee creativity and work centrality on innovative work behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 129: 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.049   [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang C, Xu J, Zhang TC, and Li QM (2020). Effects of professional identity on turnover intention in China's hotel employees: The mediating role of employee engagement and job satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45: 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.07.002   [Google Scholar]
  84. Wen Q, Wu Y, and Long J (2021). Influence of ethical leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: The role of organization-based self-esteem and flexible human resource management. Sustainability, 13(3): 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031359   [Google Scholar]
  85. Wu Y, Li RYM, Akbar S, Fu Q, Samad S, and Comite U (2022). The effectiveness of humble leadership to mitigate employee burnout in the healthcare sector: A structural equation model approach. Sustainability, 14(21): 14189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114189   [Google Scholar]
  86. Yao M and Hao M (2023). Influence of paternalistic leadership on employee innovation behavior and new venture performance: The moderating role of leader humility. Sustainability, 15(7): 5897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075897   [Google Scholar]
  87. Ye BH, Tung VWS, Li JJ, and Zhu H (2020). Leader humility, team humility and employee creative performance: The moderating roles of task dependence and competitive climate. Tourism Management, 81: 104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104170   [Google Scholar]
  88. Yu J and Wu Y (2021). The impact of enforced working from home on employee job satisfaction during COVID-19: An event system perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24): 13207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413207   [Google Scholar] PMid:34948823 PMCid:PMC8701258
  89. Zhang T, Feng J, Jiang H, Shen X, Pu B, and Gan Y (2021). Association of professional identity, job satisfaction and burnout with turnover intention among general practitioners in China: Evidence from a national survey. BMC Health Services Research, 21: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06322-6   [Google Scholar] PMid:33902579 PMCid:PMC8074426
  90. Zhou F and Wu YJ (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(3): 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181   [Google Scholar]
  91. Zula KJ and Chermack TJ (2007). Integrative literature review: Human capital planning: A review of literature and implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3): 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303762   [Google Scholar]
  92. Zúñiga C, Aguado D, and Cabrera-Tenecela P (2022). Values that work: Exploring the moderator role of protestant work ethics in the relationship between human resources practices and work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Administrative Sciences, 12(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010011   [Google Scholar]