International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 4 (April 2024), Pages: 45-51

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Is there a “flight to liquidity” phenomenon in the Saudi stock market?

 Author(s): 

 Héla Bensoltane 1, 2, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business Administration, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
 2Univ. Manouba, ESCT, LARIMRAF LR21ES29, Campus Universitaire Manouba, 2010, Tunisia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-4807

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.04.006

 Abstract

The study examines how market illiquidity shocks affect stock prices and explores the "flight to liquidity" phenomenon in the largest stock market in the Middle East, specifically the Saudi stock market. It analyzes the relationship between these shocks and stock prices to understand the impact on both small and large firms. Utilizing a comprehensive database that contains daily data of all stocks listed on the Saudi stock market for over 20 years, the research evaluates the illiquidity of each stock and the entire market on a weekly basis. Market illiquidity shocks are determined using an autoregressive model, and the effect of these shocks on Saudi stock prices is assessed through illiquidity betas in linear regressions for both large and small firms. Initial findings show that illiquidity shocks were significant during periods of oil price declines and global financial crises. The results confirm that stock prices fall in response to market illiquidity shocks, with the impact varying by firm size; larger firms' stocks are less affected, indicating a flight to liquidity towards larger firms during market downturns. This pattern aligns with observations in the US and some emerging markets.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Market illiquidity shocks, Stock prices, Flight to liquidity, Saudi stock market, Firm size impact

 Article history

 Received 15 December 2023, Received in revised form 22 March 2024, Accepted 26 March 2024

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Bensoltane H (2024). Is there a “flight to liquidity” phenomenon in the Saudi stock market? International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(4): 45-51

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (15)

  1. Acharya VV and Pedersen LH (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2): 375-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.007   [Google Scholar]
  2. Acharya VV, Amihud Y, and Bharath ST (2013). Liquidity risk of corporate bond returns: Conditional approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2): 358-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.002   [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Najjar D (2022). Impact of the twin pandemics: COVID-19 and oil crash on Saudi exchange index. PLOS ONE, 17(5): e0268733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268733   [Google Scholar] PMid:35594304 PMCid:PMC9122232
  4. Amihud Y (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1): 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6   [Google Scholar]
  5. Amihud Y (2019). Illiquidity and stock returns: A revisit. Critical Finance Review, 8(1-2): 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000073   [Google Scholar]
  6. Amihud Y and Noh J (2021). Illiquidity and stock returns II: Cross-section and time-series effects. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(4): 2101-2123. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa080   [Google Scholar]
  7. Barardehi YH, Bernhardt D, Ruchti TG, and Weidenmier M (2021). The night and day of Amihud’s (2002) liquidity measure. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 11(2): 269-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaa022   [Google Scholar]
  8. Bekaert G, Harvey CR, and Lundblad C (2007). Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(6): 1783-1831. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm030   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ben Soltane H and Naoui K (2021). Time‐varying responses of stock returns to market illiquidity: Stress scenario with regime‐switching framework. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(1): 1611-1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1866   [Google Scholar]
  10. Bensoltane H (2023). Price behavior of small and medium enterprises on the Saudi stock exchange in the face of market illiquidity. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(6): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.06.014   [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim J and Kim Y (2023). Which stock price component drives the Amihud illiquidity premium? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 64: 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101876   [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee KH (2011). The world price of liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1): 136-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.003   [Google Scholar]
  13. Lin C, Ko KC, and Lu CL (2023). Why is the Amihud (2002) measure priced in Taiwan: Illiquidity or mispricing? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79: 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101984   [Google Scholar]
  14. Pástor Ľ and Stambaugh RF (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3): 642-685. https://doi.org/10.1086/374184   [Google Scholar]
  15. Watanabe A and Watanabe M (2008). Time-varying liquidity risk and the cross section of stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(6): 2449-2486. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm054   [Google Scholar]