International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 8 (August 2024), Pages: 229-238

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Impact of responsibility shifts on warehouse performance of Indonesian police logistics staff

 Author(s): 

 Nofrisel Nofrisel 1, Prasadja Ricardianto 1, Endri Endri 2, *, Reza Rahandhi 1, Zaroni Zaroni 1, Agus Setiawan 1, Gembong Satria Negara 3, Iwan Weda 3, Asep Angga Purnama 1, Rully Agusdin 1, Dumoli H. M. Sirait 1

 Affiliation(s):

 1Study Program of Doctor Management, Postgraduate Program, Institute of Transportation and Logistics Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
 2Study Program of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
 3Program of Nautical, Maritim Faculty, Universitas Maritim AMNI Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8613-6149

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.08.024

 Abstract

The primary issue addressed in this research is the need for motivation from managers to implement responsibility shifts within the Republic of Indonesia State Police. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between shifts in responsibility and the performance of the Indonesian Police Logistics Staff in the Inbounding and Storage processes. The study used a qualitative approach, employing the Six Sigma method along with regression analysis and hypothesis testing. A sample of 132 Police Logistics Staff was surveyed. The findings showed a positive relationship between shifts in responsibility and improvements in warehouse performance, particularly in terms of inbound and storage efficiency. The results offer recommendations for enhancing efficiency through responsibility shifts. These findings could encourage officers to consider adopting responsibility shifts within the National Police Logistics Staff warehouse. Further research with a larger population and a more in-depth exploration of the impact of this transition is recommended.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Responsibility shift, Warehouse performance, Indonesian police logistics staff, Inbound and storage efficiency, Six Sigma method

 Article history

 Received 29 April 2024, Received in revised form 26 August 2024, Accepted 29 August 2024

 Acknowledgment

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and data privacy was maintained by anonymizing personal information. This study complies with ethical research standards and was approved by the relevant ethics committee.

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Nofrisel N, Ricardianto P, Endri E, Rahandhi R, Zaroni Z, Setiawan A, Negara GS, Weda I, Purnama AA, Agusdin R, and Sirait DHM (2024). Impact of responsibility shifts on warehouse performance of Indonesian police logistics staff. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(8): 229-238

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (66)

  1. Abdallah AA (2020). Simulated Six Sigma: A multi-response optimization. Quality Engineering, 32(4): 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1694151   [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdul Rahman NSF, Karim NH, Md Hanafiah R, Abdul Hamid S, and Mohammed A (2023). Decision analysis of warehouse productivity performance indicators to enhance logistics operational efficiency. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(4): 962-985. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0373   [Google Scholar]
  3. Abusaq Z (2023). Optimizing manufacturing firms’ operational performance through supply chain integration: Moderating effect of supply chain complexity. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(4): 1569-1578. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.7.012   [Google Scholar]
  4. Adeodu A, Maladzhi R, Katumba MGKK, and Daniyan I (2023). Development of an improvement framework for warehouse processes using lean Six Sigma (DMAIC) approach. A case of third party logistics (3PL) services. Heliyon, 3(4): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14915   [Google Scholar] PMid:37082643 PMCid:PMC10112039
  5. Ali SS and Kaur R (2022). Exploring the impact of technology 4.0 driven practice on warehousing performance: A hybrid approach. Mathematics, 10(8): 1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081252   [Google Scholar]
  6. Alkhawaldah R, ALShalabi F, Alshawabkeh Z, Alshaar H, Alzoubi M, Alshawabkeh R, and Dweiri M (2023). The mediating role of organizational capabilities on the relationship between lean supply chain and operational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1): 11-20. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.12.005   [Google Scholar]
  7. Alshumrani S, Munir R, and Baird K (2018). Organisational culture and strategic change in Australian local governments. Local Government Studies, 44(5): 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1481398   [Google Scholar]
  8. Angammana JSK and Jayawardena M (2022). Influence of artificial intelligence on warehouse performance: The case study of the Colombo area, Sri Lanka. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 7(2): 80-110. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2022.7-2.6   [Google Scholar]
  9. Antony J, Sony M, and Gutierrez L (2020). An empirical study into the limitations and emerging trends of Six Sigma: Findings from a global survey. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5): 2088-2101. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2995168   [Google Scholar]
  10. Antony J, Sony M, Dempsey M, Brennan A, Farrington T, and Cudney EA (2019). An evaluation into the limitations and emerging trends of Six Sigma: An empirical study. The TQM Journal, 31(2): 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2018-0191   [Google Scholar]
  11. Armstrong C, Flood PC, Guthrie JP, Liu W, MacCurtain S, and Mkamwa T (2010). The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 49(6): 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20391   [Google Scholar]
  12. Baird K and Wang H (2010). Employee empowerment: Extent of adoption and influential factors. Personnel Review, 39(5): 574-599. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011064154   [Google Scholar]
  13. Barakat M, Madkour T, and Moussa AM (2023). The role of logistics performance index on trade openness in Europe. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 25(3): 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2023.129967   [Google Scholar]
  14. Barata F, Ricardianto P, Haq L, Octaviani R, Ariohadi M, Sitorus P, and Endri E (2024). Safety risk and operational efficiency on logistic service providers’ sustainable coal supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1): 461-470. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.006   [Google Scholar]
  15. Barata F, Ricardianto P, Mulyana A, Perwitasari E, Arubusman D, Purwoko H, and Endri E (2022). Berthing time in the port of Tanjung Priok, Jakarta, Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(4): 1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.6.018   [Google Scholar]
  16. Bateman N, Philp L, and Warrender H (2016). Visual management and shop floor teams–Development, implementation and use. International Journal of Production Research, 54(24): 7345-7358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1184349   [Google Scholar]
  17. Beškovnik B (2023). Supply chain engineering: Considering parameters for sustainable overseas intermodal transport of small consignments. Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 18(1): 79-91. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2023.1.458   [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhasin S (2011). Measuring the leanness of an organisation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(1): 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461111119459   [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowen DE and Youngdahl WE (1998). “Lean” service: In defense of a production-line approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(3): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239810223510   [Google Scholar]
  20. Cahyaningratri C and Naylah M (2023). The effect of supply chain operational capabilities in consolidating organizational compatibility of supply chain process integration and business performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1): 95-102. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.11.006   [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen CM, Gong Y, De Koster RB, and Van Nunen JA (2010). A flexible evaluative framework for order picking systems. Production and Operations Management, 19(1): 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01047.x   [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng Ying N, Ab-Samat H, and Kamaruddin S (2016). Practical production layout design for multi-product and small-lot-size production: A case study. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(7): 161-175. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.2893   [Google Scholar]
  23. De Koster MD and Warffemius PMJ (2005). American, Asian and third- party international warehouse operations in Europe: A performance comparison. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(8): 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510608592   [Google Scholar]
  24. Drohomeretski E, Gouvea da Costa SE, Pinheiro de Lima E, and Garbuio PADR (2014). Lean, Six Sigma and lean Six Sigma: An analysis based on operations strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3): 804-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.842015   [Google Scholar]
  25. Edwards K and Goussios A (2021). Who is responsible for compassion satisfaction? Shifting ethical responsibility for compassion fatigue from the individual to the ecological. Ethics and Social Welfare, 15(3): 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2021.1888141   [Google Scholar]
  26. Faber N, De Koster MBM, and Smidts A (2013). Organizing warehouse management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33(9): 1230-1256. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2011-0471   [Google Scholar]
  27. Fatmawatie N and Endri E (2022). Implementation of the principles of financial governance in service companies. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(4): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i4art4   [Google Scholar]
  28. Franzke T, Grosse EH, Glock CH, and Elbert R (2017). An investigation of the effects of storage assignment and picker routing on the occurrence of picker blocking in manual picker-to-parts warehouses. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(3): 841-863. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2016-0095   [Google Scholar]
  29. Fu W, Eftekharian AA, and Campbell MI (2013). Automated manufacturing planning approach based on volume decomposition and graph-grammars. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 13(2): 021010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023860   [Google Scholar]
  30. Ghaouta A, Ouiddad A, and Okar C (2023). Measuring warehouse performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 45(3): 321-364. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2023.134716   [Google Scholar]
  31. Gutiérrez Gutiérrez LJ, Lloréns-Montes FJ, and Bustinza Sánchez ÓF (2009). Six Sigma: From a goal-theoretic perspective to shared-vision development. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29(2): 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910932039   [Google Scholar]
  32. Hackman ST, Frazelle EH, Griffin PM, Griffin SO, and Vlasta DA (2001). Benchmarking warehousing and distribution operations: An input- output approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16(1): 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011155320454   [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamour H, ALensou J, Abuzaid A, Alheet A, Madadha S, and Al-Zaqeba M (2023). The effect of strategic intelligence, effective decision-making and strategic flexibility on logistics performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2): 657-664. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.1.015   [Google Scholar]
  34. Harsono MI (2023). Logistics performance and other factors as antecedents of the sustainability performance of G-20 countries. International Journal of Economic Research and Financial Accounting, 2(1): 252-270. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v2i1.54   [Google Scholar]
  35. Ibrahim M, Karollah B, and Mahdani R (2023). The effect of supply chain innovation and e-procurement implementation on supply chain performance of manufacturing organization. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2): 698-706. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.1.011   [Google Scholar]
  36. Ismail A, Ghani JA, Ab Rahman MN, Md Deros B, and Che Haron CH (2014). Application of lean Six Sigma tools for cycle time reduction in manufacturing: Case study in biopharmaceutical industry. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39: 1449-1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0678-y   [Google Scholar]
  37. Kabadurmus O and Erdogan MS (2020). Sustainable, multimodal and reliable supply chain design. Annals of Operations Research, 292(1): 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03654-0   [Google Scholar]
  38. Kodithuwakku PIE, Wijayanayake AN, and Kavirathna CA (2022). Impact of warehouse management factors on performance improvement of 3rd party logistics industry. In the International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering, IEEE, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 5: 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSE56529.2022.9905116   [Google Scholar]
  39. Kumar D, Singh RK, Mishra R, and Wamba SF (2022). Applications of the internet of things for optimizing warehousing and logistics operations: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 171: 108455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108455   [Google Scholar]
  40. Lao SI, Choy KL, Ho GTS, Tsim YC, and Lee CKH (2011). Real-time inbound decision support system for enhancing the performance of a food warehouse. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(8): 1014-1031. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111177467   [Google Scholar]
  41. Lemke J, Kijewska K, Iwan S, and Dudek T (2021). Six Sigma in urban logistics management-A case study. Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(8): 14302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084302   [Google Scholar]
  42. Levine SS and Prietula MJ (2012). How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organization Science, 23(6): 1748-1766. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0697   [Google Scholar]
  43. Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Zaheer S, and Choo AS (2003). Six Sigma: A goal‐theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3): 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00087-6   [Google Scholar]
  44. Locke EA and Latham GP (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9): 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705   [Google Scholar] PMid:12237980
  45. Md Hanafiah R, Karim NH, Abdul Rahman NS, Abdul Hamid S, and Mohammed AM (2022). An innovative risk matrix model for warehousing productivity performance. Sustainability, 14(7): 4060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074060   [Google Scholar]
  46. Mickleson G, Thai VV, and Halim Z (2019). The influence of responsibility shift on warehousing performance: The case of Australia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.002   [Google Scholar]
  47. Minner S and Silver EA (2007). Replenishment policies for multiple products with compound-Poisson demand that share a common warehouse. International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1-2): 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.028   [Google Scholar]
  48. Neef A and Benge L (2022). Shifting responsibility and denying justice: New Zealand’s contentious approach to Pacific climate mobilities. Regional Environmental Change, 22(3): 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01951-x   [Google Scholar]
  49. Niérat P (2022). Methodological shortcuts in intermodal freight transport: Critical review and proposals. Journal of Transport Geography, 103: 103396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103396   [Google Scholar]
  50. Petersen CG and Aase G (2004). A comparison of picking, storage, and routing policies in manual order picking. International Journal of Production Economics, 92(1): 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.09.006   [Google Scholar]
  51. Petersen CG, Siu C, and Heiser DR (2005). Improving order picking performance utilizing slotting and golden zone storage. International Journal of Operations and Production Management: 25(10): 997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510619491   [Google Scholar]
  52. Randolph WA and Sashkin M (2002). Can organizational empowerment work in multinational settings? Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1): 102-115. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640205   [Google Scholar]
  53. Ricardianto P, Barata FA, Mardiyani S, Setiawan EB, Subagyo H, Saribanon E, and Endri E (2022). Supply chain management evaluation in the oil and industry natural gas using SCOR model. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3): 797–806. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.4.001   [Google Scholar]
  54. Ricardianto P, Fonataba Y, Veronica V, Marzuki S, Priyohadi N, and Wijonarko G (2023b). Determinants of logistics effectiveness on port operational performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2): 799-810. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.12.010   [Google Scholar]
  55. Ricardianto P, Widianingrum T, Endri E, Sholihah S, Apriyadi D, Kholdun A, Bakhri H, Rahandhi R, Ariohadi M and Manurung R (2023a). Enterprise risk management and supply chain effectiveness: Evidence in the Indonesian electricity project. Decision Science Letters, 12(4): 685-696. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2023.8.001   [Google Scholar]
  56. Riyanto S, Endri E, and Herlisha N (2021). Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3): 162-174. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14   [Google Scholar]
  57. Silitonga TB, Sujanto B, Luddin MR, Susita D, and Endri E (2020). Evaluation of overseas field study program at the Indonesia defense university. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(10): 554-573.   [Google Scholar]
  58. Simmler M (2023). Responsibility gap or responsibility shift? The attribution of criminal responsibility in human–machine interaction. Information, Communication and Society, 27(6): 1142–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2239895   [Google Scholar]
  59. Sony M, Antony J, Park S, and Mutingi M (2019). Key criticisms of Six Sigma: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3): 950-962. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2889517   [Google Scholar]
  60. Suharto S (2023). Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2): 557-564. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.2.009   [Google Scholar]
  61. Sweis RJ, Asma’a SI, Amayreh I, and Al-Sayyed N (2019). The relationship between total quality management (TQM) implementation and organisation performance: Evidence from the airlines companies in UAE. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 11(1): 58-219.   [Google Scholar]
  62. Tang YM, Ho GTS, Lau YY, and Tsui SY (2022). Integrated smart warehouse and manufacturing management with demand forecasting in small-scale cyclical industries. Machines, 10(6): 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10060472   [Google Scholar]
  63. Tarigan UPP, Novemingsen R, and Lu D (2023). Implementation of lean Six Sigma to reduce work time waste in the goods transportation department. Journal Knowledge Industrial Engineering, 10(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35891/jkie.v10i1.3730   [Google Scholar]
  64. Wahyuni T, Ricardianto P, Harits A, Thamrin M, Liana E, Anggara D, Abidin Z, Setyowati T, Sugiyanto S, and Endri E (2022). The implementation of minimum service standards on ship operational performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(4): 1297-1304. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.7.010   [Google Scholar]
  65. Whitson J and French M (2021). Productive play: The shift from responsible consumption to responsible production. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1): 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993922   [Google Scholar]
  66. Womack JP, Jones DT, and Roos D (1990). The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]