Volume 11, Issue 4 (April 2024), Pages: 155-160
----------------------------------------------
Original Research Paper
Nursing students' experiences of the clinical learning environment at Hafr Al Batin University: A cross-sectional study
Author(s):
Jalal Alharbi, Mukhlid Alshammari *
Affiliation(s):
Nursing Department, College of Applied Medical Science, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia
Full text
Full Text - PDF
* Corresponding Author.
Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-3012
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.04.017
Abstract
The clinical learning environment plays a crucial role in nursing education, significantly affecting student learning. This research aimed to examine the learning experiences of nursing students at the University of Hafr Al Batin, specifically within their clinical learning environments. The study used the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision, and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale to assess these experiences in hospital placements. Participants included nursing students in their second year and beyond who had completed at least one clinical placement in hospitals. The research adopted a quantitative approach, utilizing descriptive and inferential statistical methods for data analysis. Results indicated that final-year students were less satisfied with certain aspects, including the physical environment of the ward, supervisory relationships, and the involvement of nurse teachers. In contrast, second and third-year students generally viewed the clinical learning environment more positively. These outcomes are consistent with findings from international studies. The study suggests the importance of enhancing the roles of nurse teachers and supervisors to improve nursing students' learning experiences. Further qualitative research is recommended to gain a deeper understanding of these issues.
© 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords
Nursing education, Clinical learning environment, CLES+T scale, Student experiences, University of Hafr Al Batin
Article history
Received 24 November 2023, Received in revised form 11 April 2024, Accepted 15 April 2024
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the participants in this research and the administration of the Applied Medical Science College for facilitating the data collection. The authors are also thankful to the University of Hafr Al Batin for supporting the research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical considerations
This research was approved by the University of Hafr Al Batin Scientific Research Center and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in Saudi Arabia (Approval No. UHB-004-03-2023).
Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Citation:
Alharbi J and Alshammari M (2024). Nursing students' experiences of the clinical learning environment at Hafr Al Batin University: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(4): 155-160
Permanent Link to this page
Figures
No Figure
Tables
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
----------------------------------------------
References (17)
- Alharbi AM, Alshammari AA, and Naqvi HA (2022). The gap between the perceptions and expectations of quality of services delivered to the participants at the scientific conferences using the university of Hafr Al Batin as a model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 909489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909489 [Google Scholar] PMid:35928406 PMCid:PMC9343774
- Atay S, Kurt FY, Aslan GK, Saarikoski M, Yılmaz H, and Ekinci V (2018). Validity and reliability of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 26: e3037. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2413.3037 [Google Scholar] PMid:30208159 PMCid:PMC6136536
- Baškarada S and Koronios A (2018). A philosophical discussion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research in social science. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(1): 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00042 [Google Scholar]
- Calma KRB, McInnes S, Halcomb E, Williams A, and Batterham M (2022). Confidence, interest and intentions of final-year nursing students regarding employment in general practice. Collegian, 29(2): 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2021.08.005 [Google Scholar]
- De Witte N, Labeau S, and De Keyzer W (2011). The clinical learning environment and supervision instrument (CLES): Validity and reliability of the Dutch version (CLES+NL). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(5): 568-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.009 [Google Scholar] PMid:20947082
- Guejdad K, Ikrou A, Strandell-Laine C, Abouqal R, and Belayachi J (2022). Clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: Translation and validation of the Arabic version. Nurse Education in Practice, 63: 103374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103374 [Google Scholar] PMid:35690005
- Gurková E, Žiaková K, Cibríková S, Magurová D, Hudáková A, and Mrosková S (2016). Factors influencing the effectiveness of clinical learning environment in nursing education. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 7(3): 470-475. https://doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2016.07.0017 [Google Scholar]
- Gurková E, Žiaková K, Vörösová G, Kadučáková H, and Botíková A (2018). Validating the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES+T scale) in Slovakia. Kontakt, 20(1): e3-e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.003 [Google Scholar]
- Kang H (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18: 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17 [Google Scholar] PMid:34325496 PMCid:PMC8441096
- Khatoon S, Sha SY, Khan A, Ali Z, and Ali SA (2019). Assessment of clinical learning environment, supervision (CLES) among nursing students, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. Open Journal of Nursing, 9(4): 91856. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2019.94037 [Google Scholar]
- Lamont S, Brunero S, and Woods KP (2015). Satisfaction with clinical placement–The perspective of nursing students from multiple universities. Collegian, 22(1): 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2013.12.005 [Google Scholar] PMid:26285417
- McCloskey R, Yetman L, Stewart C, Slayter J, Jarrett P, McCollum A, and Stoica G (2020). Changes in nursing students' knowledge, attitudes and interest in caring for older adults: A longitudinal cohort study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44: 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102760 [Google Scholar] PMid:32234668
- Saarikoski M, Warne T, Kaila P, and Leino-Kilpi H (2009). The role of the nurse teacher in clinical practice: An empirical study of Finnish student nurse experiences. Nurse Education Today, 29(6): 595-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.01.005 [Google Scholar] PMid:19232789
- Tariq S and Woodman J (2013). Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Reports, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313479197 [Google Scholar] PMid:23885291 PMCid:PMC3697857
- Vizcaya-Moreno FM, Perez-Canaveras RM, De Juan J, and Saarikoski M (2015). Development and psychometric testing of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T): The Spanish version. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1): 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.008 [Google Scholar] PMid:25220932
- Widad A and Abdellah G (2022). Strategies used to teach soft skills in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 42: 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.010 [Google Scholar] PMid:36150863
- Zhang J, Shields L, Ma B, Yin Y, Wang J, Zhang R, and Hui X (2022). The clinical learning environment, supervision and future intention to work as a nurse in nursing students: A cross-sectional and descriptive study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03609-y [Google Scholar] PMid:35841091 PMCid:PMC9284732
|