International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 10 (October 2024), Pages: 140-146

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Altruistic leadership: A quantitative analysis of its effects on school culture, teacher integrity, and performance in Muhammadiyah middle schools in Indonesia

 Author(s): 

 Istanto Istanto 1, *, Fakhruddin Fakhruddin 2, Heri Yanto 3, Suwito Eko Pramono 4

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Educational Management, Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
 2Faculty of Education and Psychology, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
 3Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
 4Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4546-2050

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.10.016

 Abstract

This study aims to explore how philanthropic leadership affects the performance of top Muhammadiyah Middle Schools in Central Java. It also examines how altruistic leadership influences teacher integrity, school culture, teacher discipline, and overall school performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of teacher integrity, school culture, and teacher discipline on school performance. The research follows a quantitative approach, using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for data analysis. Data were collected from teachers and staff at 288 Muhammadiyah Middle Schools in 35 districts/cities in Central Java, using a multistage random sampling technique. The study focused on variables such as altruistic leadership, school culture, teacher integrity, teacher discipline, and school performance, with information gathered through questionnaires. The findings show that altruistic leadership has a significant positive effect on school performance and, along with teacher integrity and school culture, improves school outcomes. However, altruistic leadership does not have a strong effect on teacher discipline.

 © 2024 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Philanthropic leadership, School performance, Teacher integrity, School culture, Teacher discipline

 Article history

 Received 25 June 2024, Received in revised form 23 September 2024, Accepted 4 October 2024

 Acknowledgment

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

All participants provided informed consent, and their privacy and confidentiality were strictly maintained. Data were anonymized and securely stored, with access limited to authorized personnel. This study adhered to ethical guidelines to ensure integrity and transparency in reporting.

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Istanto I, Fakhruddin F, Yanto H, and Pramono SE (2024). Altruistic leadership: A quantitative analysis of its effects on school culture, teacher integrity, and performance in Muhammadiyah middle schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(10): 140-146

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (28)

  1. Abdullah M (2019). School culture to serve performance of madrasah in Indonesia. QIJIS: Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1): 71-100. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i1.4809   [Google Scholar]
  2. Agustina A and Anshory MI (2023). Activities of the Muhammadiyah student association (IPM) at SMK Muhammadiyah Karanganyar. SUHUF, 35(1): 31-37. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v35i1.22616   [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson JC and Gerbing DW (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411   [Google Scholar]
  4. Apriantoro MS, Faradilla S, El Ashfahany A, Maruf A, and Aziza NA (2024). Quantifying intellectual terrain: Islamic jurisprudence, ethical discourse, and scholarly impact. SUHUF, 36(1): 78-85. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i1.4367   [Google Scholar]
  5. Apriantoro MS, Muthoifin M, and Athief FHN (2023). Advancing social impact through Islamic social finance: A comprehensive‎ bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Advanced and Applied‎ Sciences, 10(11): 81-89. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.011   [Google Scholar]
  6. Astyandini B, Pramono SE, Endang RS, and Yulianto A (2023). Optimization of motivation to improve the research performance of lecturers in the midwifery department. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12): e2046-e2046. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2046   [Google Scholar]
  7. Berdeaux KL, Lerman DC, and Williams SD (2022). Effects of environmental distractions on teachers' procedural integrity with three function‐based treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(3): 832-850. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.918   [Google Scholar] PMid:35377494
  8. Brilliany KA and Indrawati (2022). Factors influencing continuance intention to use online food delivery in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 5(2): 248–256. https://doi.org/10.37602/IJSSMR.2022.5217   [Google Scholar]
  9. Evermann J and Tate M (2016). Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 4565-4582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.050   [Google Scholar]
  10. Febrilia I and Warokka A (2021). Consumer traits and situational factors: Exploring the consumer's online impulse buying in the pandemic time. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 4(1): 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100182   [Google Scholar]
  11. Goduscheit RC, Khanin D, Mahto RV, and McDowell WC (2021). Structural holes and social entrepreneurs as altruistic brokers. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(2): 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.12.001   [Google Scholar]
  12. Gulfraz MB, Sufyan M, Mustak M, Salminen J, and Srivastava DK (2022). Understanding the impact of online customers' shopping experience on online impulsive buying: A study on two leading e-commerce platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68: 103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103000   [Google Scholar]
  13. Gunden N, Morosan C, and DeFranco A (2020). Consumers' intentions to use online food delivery systems in the USA. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3): 1325-1345. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2019-0595   [Google Scholar]
  14. Harimurti SM and Alam S (2024). Efforts to save the universe: Muhammadiyah's concern for the environment. SUHUF, 36(1): 44-54. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i1.4422   [Google Scholar]
  15. Hibino Y (2023). The advantages and disadvantages of altruistic and commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 18: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00130-y   [Google Scholar] PMid:37420245 PMCid:PMC10327345
  16. Hidayat N and Wulandari F (2020). The impact of leadership behavior on school performance. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3): 493-506. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.31005   [Google Scholar]
  17. Hooper D, Coughlan J, and Mullen MR (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1): 53–60.   [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu LT and Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118   [Google Scholar]
  19. Jangmo A, Stålhandske A, Chang Z, Chen Q, Almqvist C, Feldman I, Bulik CM, Lichtenstein P, D'Onofrio B, Kuja-Halkola R, and Larsson H (2019). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, school performance, and effect of medication. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(4): 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.11.014   [Google Scholar] PMid:30768391 PMCid:PMC6541488
  20. Khadka BB and Bhattarai PC (2021). Integrity triad as doubled edged sword for head-teachers' integrity: A case from Nepal. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17: 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00092-8   [Google Scholar]
  21. Lahath A, Omar NA, Ali MH, Tseng ML, and Yazid Z (2021). Exploring food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic among Malaysian consumers: The effect of social media, neuroticism, and impulse buying on food waste. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.008   [Google Scholar] PMid:34722847 PMCid:PMC8536942
  22. Purwaningtias F, Ulfa M, and Franata F (2020). Decision support system for selection of the best member at Junjung Biru Waste Bank using the composite performance index (CPI). Khazanah Informatika: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika, 6(2): 184-189. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v6i2.11058   [Google Scholar]
  23. Saptono A, Wibowo A, Narmaditya BS, Karyaningsih RPD, and Yanto H (2020). Does entrepreneurial education matter for Indonesian students' entrepreneurial preparation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset and knowledge. Cogent Education, 7(1): 1836728. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1836728   [Google Scholar]
  24. Singh J, Singh G, Kumar S, and Mathur AN (2021). Religious influences in unrestrained consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58: 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102262   [Google Scholar]
  25. Tonich T (2021). The role of principals' leadership abilities in improving school performance through the school culture. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1): 47-75.   [Google Scholar]
  26. Udonsathian T and Worapun W (2024). Enhancing analytical thinking in grade 8 science education: Integrating 5E inquiry-based and 5W1H techniques. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(5): 62–69. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.05.007   [Google Scholar]
  27. Wote AYV and Sero WP (2021). The contribution of principals' leadership role and teachers' integrity to elementary school teachers' performance. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2): 330-336. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i2.34422   [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang Y, Wang Y, Easa SM, and Yan X (2023). Risk factors influencing tunnel construction safety: Structural equation model approach. Heliyon, 9(1): e12924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12924   [Google Scholar] PMid:36704287 PMCid:PMC9871213