International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 6, Issue 5 (May 2019), Pages: 18-24

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Dynamic response of simple bridge due to moving vehicles in both along opposite directions

 Author(s): Hoa P. Hoang 1, Trung D. Pham 2, *, Oanh T. K. Do 2, Phuoc T. Nguyen 3

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Construction of Bridge and Road, University of Science and Technology, The University of Danang, Danang, Vietnam
 2Department of Civil Engineering, Mientrung University of Civil Engineering, 24 Nguyen Du St., Tuy Hoa, Vietnam
 3Department of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan St., Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-0640

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.05.004

 Abstract:

The purpose of this study is presenting the dynamic response of a simple bridge subjected to moving vehicles using finite element method. The moving vehicles move in both along opposite directions on the simple bridge at different speeds, described by two masses as car body and wheel, respectively. Based on dynamic balance principle, the governing equation of motion of the bridge-vehicle interaction is derived and solved by the Newmark method in the time domain. At the same time, the characteristic parameters of the moving vehicles such as the ratios of initial position and speed of the vehicles are proposed. And then, the influence of the above parameters on the dynamic response of the bridge-vehicle interaction is investigated in detail. The numerical results showed that those parameters affect significantly the dynamic response of the bridge-vehicle interaction. It is evidently more increasing the dynamic response of the bridge-vehicles interaction than other cases. Hence, this study can be considered as meaningful practice document in the problems of design and response analysis of the bridge due to moving traffic load. 

 © 2019 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Bridge-vehicle interaction, Moving vehicle, Opposite directions, Finite element method

 Article History: Received 18 December 2018, Received in revised form 3 March 2019, Accepted 6 March 2019

 Acknowledgement:

No Acknowledgement

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest:  The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Hoang HP, Pham TD, and Do OTK et al. (2019). Dynamic response of simple bridge due to moving vehicles in both along opposite directions. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(5): 18-24

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 15 

 Tables

 Table 1

----------------------------------------------

 References (20) 

  1. An L, Li D, Yu P, and Yuan P (2016). Numerical analysis of dynamic response of vehicle–bridge coupled system on long-span continuous girder bridge. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 6(4): 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2016.05.006   [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoang HP, Pham TD, Pham QT, and Nguyen TP (2019). Dynamic response of bridge-vehicle three phases interaction considering the effects of sudden heavy braking. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(2): 39-47. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.02.007   [Google Scholar]
  3. Jun Z, Gou MK, and Liang C (2017). Experimental simulation of bridges subjected by moving loads. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 873: 208-211. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.873.208   [Google Scholar]
  4. Jun Z, Liu J, Ni XL, Li W, and Mu R (2010). Dynamic model of a discrete-pontoon floating bridge subjected by moving loads. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 29-32: 732-737. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.29-32.732   [Google Scholar]
  5. Michaltsos GT (2002). Dynamic behaviour of a single-span beam subjected to loads moving with variable speeds. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 258(2): 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5141   [Google Scholar]
  6. Neves SGM, Azevedo AFM, and Calçada R (2012). A direct method for analyzing the vertical vehicle–structure interaction. Engineering Structures, 34: 414-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.010   [Google Scholar]
  7. Pham D, Pham QT, Nguyen TB, Hoang HP, and Nguyen PT (2018). Dynamic response of multi-span arch bridge on spring supports subjected to moving vehicle. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.10.006   [Google Scholar]
  8. Reis M and Pala Y (2009). Dynamic response of a slightly curved bridges under moving mass loads. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 4(3): 143-148. https://doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.143-148   [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun Z and Zhang YF (2014). Vehicle-induced dynamic response of expansion joints in long span bridges. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 584-586: 2117-2120. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.584-586.2117   [Google Scholar]
  10. Vaidya T and Chatterjee A (2017). Vibration of road bridges under moving vehicles: A comparative study between single contact point and two contact point models. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 41(1): 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2017-1007   [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu JS and Chiang LK (2004). Dynamic analysis of an arch due to a moving load. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 269(3-5): 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00020-8   [Google Scholar]
  12. Yan H, Xiao DW, and Chao QL (2013). Influence of moving vehicles on vertical vibration of simply supported bridge. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 405-408: 1578-1586. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.1578   [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang YB and Yau JD (1997). Vehicle-bridge interaction element for dynamic analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(11): 1512-1518. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1512)   [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang YB, Lin CW, and Yau JD (2004). Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 272(3-5): 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00378-X   [Google Scholar]
  15. Ye M, Tan P, Ren M, Ning XL, and Zhou FL (2010). Evolutionary random vibration analysis of a bridge subjected to moving vehicles. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 23(3): 269-274.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Yin X, Fang Z, Cai CS, and Deng L (2010). Non-stationary random vibration of bridges under vehicles with variable speed. Engineering Structures, 32(8): 2166-2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.019   [Google Scholar]
  17. Yu H, Wang B, Li Y, Zhang Y, and Zhang W (2018). Road vehicle-bridge interaction considering varied vehicle speed based on convenient combination of Simulink and ANSYS. Shock and Vibration, 2018: Article ID 1389628. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1389628   [Google Scholar]
  18. Yue LONG, Yi ZUO, Qiu-fan WU, and Yiran Y (2005). Study and countermeasures for deterioration of arch bridge cable hangers. Bridge Construction, 3: 70-72.   [Google Scholar]
  19. Yueqin J and Wei P (2005). The Arch Bridge disease analysis and replacement process. East China Highway, 6: 31-33.   [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang JF, Li XZ, Song LZ, and Shan CS (2013). Analysis on vertical dynamic response of simply-supported bridge subjected to a series of moving harmonic loads. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 361: 1329-1334. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.361-363.1329   [Google Scholar]