International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

EISSN: 2313-3724

Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Volume 4, Issue 9  (September 2017), Pages:  101-107

Title: Comparisons of earthworm community structure between different ecotypes

Author(s):  Ma. Theresa C. Pareño *, Cesar G. Demayo

Affiliation(s):

Department of Biological Science, College of Science and Mathematics, Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines

https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.09.013

Full Text - PDF          XML

Abstract:

The Philippines is considered to be a biodiversity “hotspot” of high species richness and endemism but the increased in human population and the destruction of the environment triggered the decline of biodiversity. Habitat complexity and the specialized niches available to animals are lost due to deforestation and anthropogenic activities. As good bioindicators and soil ecosystem engineers, earthworms play an important role for the decomposition, remediation of the soil in the form of their casts and food source for the other animals. This study was conducted to determine the biodiversity of earthworms from 3 different ecotypes namely forest, riverbank, and agricultural area. To determine on to what genus they belong, there were a total of 64 morphological characters that were used. There are a total of 4 genera that were identified from the 3 families namely, Eudrilidae, Megascolecidae, and Glossoscolecidae. The 4 genus were namely, Eudrilus eugeniae, P. corethrurus, and 2 pheretima sp. This study shows that these species were actually invasive that even in the forest they are still present. But results show the forest has the most number of species compared to the other ecotypes like river and agricultural area. 

© 2017 The Authors. Published by IASE.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Keywords: Clay-loam soil, Thermal property, Single probe, Moisture content, Bulk density

Article History: Received 20 February 2017, Received in revised form 25 July 2017, Accepted 25 July 2017

Digital Object Identifier: 

https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.09.013

Citation:

Pareño MTC and Demayo CG (2017). Comparisons of earthworm community structure between different ecotypes. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(9): 101-107

http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/V4I9/Theresa.html

References:

  1. Apuan DA, Torres MAJ, and Demayo CG (2010). Describing variations and taxonomic status of earthworms collected from selected areas in Misamis Oriental, Philippines using principal component and parsimony analysis. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, B, Zoology, 2: 27-36. 
  2. Aspe NM, Nu-eza OM, and Torres MA (2009). Diversity and distribution of earthworms in Mt. Malindang, Philippines. Journal of Nature Studies, 8: 59-67.     
  3. Blackburn JC (1989). External anatomy of earthworms. Science, 207: 2572–2577.     
  4. Callaham MA, Stewart AJ, Alarcón C, and McMillen SJ (2002). Effects of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw additions on selected properties of petroleum‐contaminated soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 21(8): 1658-1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210817          PMid:12152766 
  5. Ehrenfeld JG and Scott N (2001). Invasive species and the soil: Effects on organisms and ecosystem processes. Ecological Applications, 11(5): 1259-1260. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1259:ISATSE]2.0.CO;2 
  6. Fragoso C and Lavelle P (1992). Earthworm communities of tropical rain forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(12): 1397-1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90124-G 
  7. Gates GE (1972). Burmese earthworms: An introduction to the systematics and biology of megadrile oligochaetes with special reference to Southeast Asia. Transactions of the American philosophical Society, 62(7): 321-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/1006214 
  8. Hendrix PF (1995). Earthworm ecology and biogeography in North America. CRC press, Boca Raton, USA.     
  9. Hendrix PF and Bohlen PJ (2002). Exotic earthworm invasions in North America: Ecological and policy implications expanding global commerce may be increasing the likelihood of exotic earthworm invasions, which could have negative implications for soil processes, other animal and plant species, and importation of certain pathogens. Bioscience, 52(9): 801-811. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0801:EEIINA]2.0.CO;2 
  10. James SW (2004). New species of Amynthas, Pheretima and Pleionogaster (Clitellata: Megascolecidae) of the Mt. Kitanglad range, Mindanao island, Philippines. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 52(2): 289-313.     
  11. Kalisz PJ and Dotson DB (1989). Land-use history and the occurrence of exotic earthworms in the mountains of eastern Kentucky. American Midland Naturalist, 122: 288-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425915 
  12. Lapied E and Lavelle P (2003). The peregrine earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus in the east coast of Costa Rica. Pedobiologia, 47(5-6): 471-474. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00215 
  13. Lavelle P, Brussard L, and Hendrix PF (1999). Earthworm management in tropical agroecosystems. CABI Publishing, Oxford, UK.     
  14. Liu ZG and Zou XM (2002). Exotic earthworms accelerate plant litter decomposition in a Puerto Rican pasture and a wet forest. Ecological Applications, 12(5): 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1406:EEAPLD]2.0.CO;2 
  15. Paoletti MG (1999). The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 74(1): 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00034-1 
  16. Rickart EA, Heaney LR, and Utzurrum RC (1991). Distribution and ecology of small mammals along an elevational transect in southeastern Luzon, Philippines. Journal of Mammalogy, 72(3): 458-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382128 
  17. Segun AO (1998). Tropical zoology. University Press PLC, Ibadan, Nigeria.     
  18. Sims RW and Easton EG (1972). A numerical revision of the earthworm genus Pheretima auct, (Megascolecidae: Oligochaeta) with the recognition of new genera and an appendix on the earthworms collected by the Royal Society North Borneo Expedition. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 4(3): 169-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1972.tb00694.x 
  19. Suarez RK and Sajise PE (2010). Deforestation, swidden agriculture and Philippine biodiversity. Philippine Science Letters, 3(1): 91-99.     
  20. Tian G, Brussaard L, and Kang BT (1995). Breakdown of plant residues with contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions: Effects of earthworms and millipedes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27(3): 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00182-Z 
  21. Zou X, Pérez BA, Santiago DCR, Gutiérrez J, and Santiago MR (2006). Comparisons of earthworm community structure between an active pasture and an adjacent tropical wet forest in Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 42(3): 311-314.