International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

EISSN: 2313-3724

Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Volume 4, Issue 7  (July 2017), Pages:  39-49


Title:  Coexistence and interference analysis in TV white spaces

Author(s):  Kenneth Kimani 1, *, Kibet Langat 1, Vitalice Oduol 2

Affiliation(s):

1Department of Telecommunications and Information Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya
2Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.07.007

Full Text - PDF          XML

Abstract:

The demand for wireless connectivity is increasing exponentially resulting in an unprecedented demand on the limited radio spectrum. Due to the current fixed spectrum licensing scheme, it is becoming increasingly arduous to find extra spectrum resulting in a paradigm shift towards efficient utilization of radio spectrum in order to address the spectrum scarcity. The transition from analogue to digital terrestrial television has freed-up some spectrum thereby creating unique opportunities for exploitation of locally underused portions of the TV bands referred to as TV white spaces (TVWS) and their exploitation offers an attractive way of making efficient use of radio spectrum as long as the secondary users do not interfere with the primary users. This is enabled by employing cognitive radio technology that allows for dynamic spectrum access. This paper investigates the aspect of interference in TV White spaces and the possibility of mutual coexistence between primary users and secondary users operating in TV White spaces. The impact of interfering signals is undertaken to show the probability of interference in both same channel and different adjacent channels scenarios. The interference analysis is carried out using the SEAMCAT simulation software. Simulation results show that in a power limited secondary network, vacation of cognitive users from active spectrum bands is crucial for ensuring coexistence. The various interference mitigation mechanisms employed by CR networks are also reviewed. In TV white spaces, mitigating interference is vital not only for primary user protection, but also for ensuring the quality of service of the secondary users. 

© 2017 The Authors. Published by IASE.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Keywords: TV white space, Interference, Digital dividend, Spectrum, Co-existence

Article History: Received 27 February 2017, Received in revised form 18 May 2017, Accepted 23 May 2017

Digital Object Identifier: 

https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.07.007

Citation:

Kimani K, Langat K, and Oduol V (2017). Coexistence and interference analysis in TV white spaces. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(7): 39-49

http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/V4I7/Kimani.html


References:

Agrawal S, Bhatia R, and Bhadoria MS (2016). Interference mapping for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 6(4): 696-702.
Arato SS and Kalecha PO (2013). UHF (700 MHz) spectrum band occupancy measurements, analysis and considerations for deployment of long term evolution (LTE) deployment in Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4(11): 572-580.
Bhattacharya PP, Khandelwal R, Gera R, and Agarwal A (2011). Smart radio spectrum management for cognitive radio. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS), 2(4): 12-24.
Cacciapuoti AS and Caleffi M (2015). Interference analysis for secondary coexistence in TV white space. IEEE Communication Letters, 19(3): 383-386.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2386349
Choi JP, Chang HM, Choi HN, and Lee WC (2012). A study on interference analysis between DVB-T2 broadcasting service and TV white space device. In the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks, IEEE, Phuket, Thailand: 234-235. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2012.6261701
PMCid:PMC4716104
Dionisio R, Marques P, and Rodriguez J (2012). Interference study between wireless microphone systems and TV white space devices. In the IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE, Ottawa, Canada: 1874-1878. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2012.6364101
ECO (2016). SEAMCAT handbook (Vol. 2). European Communications Office, København, Denmark
FCC (2008). Second report and order and memorandum opinion and order FCC 08-260 pg 65. Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory report, Washington, USA.
Foo YL (2016). Interference analysis of cognitive radio networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(8). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/exportCitation/doi/10.1002/dac.3176
Foo YL and Takada Ji (2016). Coexistence of DTV and TV white space systems. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(9). https://doi.org/ 10.1002/dac.3222
Holland O, Bogucka H, and Medeisis A (2015). Validating the extended hata model for use in UHFs. In Holland O, Bogucka H, and Medeisis A (Eds.), Opportunistic Spectrum Sharing and White Space Access: 482-497. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA.
Kennedy R, George K, Vitalice O, and Okello-Odongo W (2015). TV white spaces in Africa: Trials and role in improving broadband access in Africa. In AFRICON, IEEE Africon, Ababa, Ethiopia: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2015. 7331920
https://doi.org/10.1109/afrcon.2015.7331920
Mody DA (2013). IEEE 802.22 –Cognitive radio-based regional area and smart utility networks. ITU Regional Radio-communications Seminar for Arab Countries: Cognitive Radio and TVWS Workshop. Available online at: http://smartgrid.epri.com/doc/Mody_IEEE802_22_Cognitive_Radio_based_Smart_Utility_Networks_v2.pdf
Popescu V, Fadda M, and Murroni M (2016a). Performance analysis of IEEE 802.22 wireless regional area network in the presence of digital video broadcasting – second generation terrestrial broadcasting services. IET Communications, 10(8): 922-928.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2015.1117
Popescu V, Fadda M, Murroni M, and Giusto D (2016b). Coexistence Issues for IEEE 802.22 WRAN and DVB-T2 Networks. In the IEEE International Conference on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, Nara, Japan: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB.2016.7521899
Popescu V, Fadda M, Murroni M, Morgade J, and Angueira P (2014). Co-channel and adjacent channel interference and protection issues for DVB-T2 and IEEE 802.22 WRAN operation. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 60(4): 693-700.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2014.2360024
Puri S (2012). Analysis of interference from secondary system in TV white space. M.Sc. Thesis, Radio Communication Systems Group, KTH Information and Communication Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sendrei L, Felix M, Oravec J, and Marchevskys S (2015). Coexistence simulation of DVB-T/T2 AND LTE800 in seam cat. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 15(3): 32-38.
https://doi.org/10.15546/aeei-2015-0026
Sum CS, Harada H, Kojima F, Lan Z, and Funada R (2011). Smart utility networks in TV white space. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(7): 132-139.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5936166
Sum CS, Villardi GP, Rahman MA, Baykas T, Tran HN, Lan Z, and Pyo CW (2013). Cognitive communication in TV white spaces: An overview of regulations, standards, and technology. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7): 138-145.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553690
Vieira RD, Souza EB, Cavalcante A, Pirhonen R, Kafle P, Malkov A, and Li Z (2010). Interference analysis of coexistence scenarios in TV white spaces. In the 7th International Telecommunications Conference of Nokia Technology Institute. Manaus, Brazil. Available online at: http://www.cricte2004.eletrica.ufpr.br/anais/sbrt/SBrT28/71533.pdf
Waddell M, Lillywhite A, Reihl E, Brookes K, Ernst F, Fehr M, Copsy B (2012). Initial considerations for protection of PMSE. BBC Research and Development White Paper, WHP 224. Available online at: http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp-pdf-files/WHP224.pdf
Xin C and Song M (2015). Opportunistic spectrum access. In: Xin C and Song M (Eds.), Spectrum Sharing for Wireless Communications: 7-16. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13803-9_2