Volume 10, Issue 9 (September 2023), Pages: 92-100

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Geostatistical assessment of unconfined compressive strength of rocks in Northeast Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

 Author(s): 

 Mohammed A. M. Alghamdi *

 Affiliation(s):

 Engineering Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-5698

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.09.011

 Abstract:

The determination of rock strength holds paramount importance in the field of engineering geology. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive geostatistical evaluation of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) within a 100 km2 area situated in northeast Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The UCS values were indirectly estimated using an empirical equation based on the Schmidt hammer rebound method, resulting in a range of strengths from 9.2 to 198.4 MPa. The corresponding mean UCS values vary between 60.3 to 81.7 MPa, with standard deviations ranging from 18.6 to 45.3 MPa. The analysis revealed that, among the sites examined, a specific location exhibited the highest median UCS value of 72.2 MPa, while another site recorded the lowest value of 56.2 MPa. Based on the distribution of UCS values, the study area was classified into five distinct strength categories: very low, low, medium, high, and very high. Notably, the majority of variability in UCS values was confined within the middle 50% range, as evident from the interquartile range (IQR) below 30 MPa. Additionally, certain sites displayed a tighter cluster of UCS values, while an IQR of DEFJ≥60 indicated a more widespread distribution of strength values. Furthermore, two locations were identified as representing the minimum and maximum UCS values within a 95% confidence interval. The UCS in location A was estimated at 60.25±9.14 MPa, whereas in location B, it was 81.72±8.50 MPa. These findings offer valuable insights into the rock strength characteristics of the designated area, providing essential data for engineering and geotechnical applications.

 © 2023 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Rock strength determination, Unconfined compressive strength, Geostatistical evaluation, Geotechnical analysis, Schmidt hammer rebound method

 Article History: Received 15 April 2023, Received in revised form 23 July 2023, Accepted 14 August 2023

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Alghamdi MAM (2023). Geostatistical assessment of unconfined compressive strength of rocks in Northeast Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(9): 92-100

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (14)

1. Acharya S and Chellappan S (2017). Pro Tableau: A step-by-step guide. Apress, Berkeley, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2352-9   [Google Scholar]
2. Aladejare AE, Alofe ED, Onifade M, Lawal AI, Ozoji TM, and Zhang ZX (2021). Empirical estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock: Database of simple, multiple, and artificial intelligence-based regressions. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39: 4427-4455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01772-5   [Google Scholar]
3. Alwash MA and Zakir FAR (1992). Tectonic analysis of the Jeddah Taif area on the basis of LANDSAT satellite data. Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 15(2): 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(92)90076-O   [Google Scholar]
4. ASTM (2005). Standard test method for determination of rock hardness by Rebound hammer method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA.   [Google Scholar]
5. Aydin A and Basu A (2005). The Schmidt hammer in rock material characterization. Engineering Geology, 81(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.006   [Google Scholar]
6. Bewick RP, Amann F, Kaiser PK, and Martin CD (2015). Interpretation of UCS test results for engineering design. In the 13^th ISRM International Congress of Rock Mechanics, OnePetro, Montreal, Canada.   [Google Scholar]
7. Bolla A and Paronuzzi P (2021). UCS field estimation of intact rock using the Schmidt hammer: A new empirical approach. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 833(1): 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012014   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown ET (1981). Rock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford , UK.   [Google Scholar]
9. González de Vallejo LI and Ferrer M (2011). Geological engineering. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11745   [Google Scholar]
10. Mesaed AA, Alghamdi MA, and Sonbul AR (2020). Landforms evolution of Wadi Qudaid area, west central Arabian shield, Saudi Arabia: An example of the role of the geological factors in the urban extensions. Open Journal of Geology, 10(6): 612-640. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.106028   [Google Scholar]
11. Morita N (2021). Numerical methods for the borehole breakout problems using Geo3D. In: Morita N (Ed.), Finite element programming in nonlinear geomechanics and transient flow: 241-345. Gulf Professional Publishing, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91112-2.00017-3   [Google Scholar] PMCid:PMC8616739
12. Spencer CH, Cartier A, and Vincent PL (1988). Industrial mineral resources map of Jiddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.   [Google Scholar]
13. Wang M and Wan W (2019). A new empirical formula for evaluating uniaxial compressive strength using the Schmidt hammer test. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 123: 104094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104094   [Google Scholar]
14. Yılmaz I and Sendır H (2002). Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and Young's modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Engineering Geology, 66(3-4): 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00041-8   [Google Scholar]