Volume 10, Issue 7 (July 2023), Pages: 48-53
----------------------------------------------
Original Research Paper
Machine learning in predicting anti-money laundering compliance with protection motivation theory among professional accountants
Author(s):
Suraya Masrom 1, Masetah Ahmad Tarmizi 2, Sunarti Halid 2, Rahayu Abdul Rahman 2, *, Abdullah Sani Abd Rahman 3, Roslina Ibrahim 4
Affiliation(s):
1Computing Science Studies, College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch Tapah Campus, Perak, Malaysia
2Faculty of Accounting, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch Tapah Campus, Perak, Malaysia
3Faculty of Sciences and Information Technology, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Perak, Malaysia
4Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Full Text - PDF XML
* Corresponding Author.
Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-1096
Digital Object Identifier:
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.07.007
Abstract:
Money laundering represents a significant global threat, necessitating the vigilance of professional accountants in detecting and reporting suspicious customer activities within their jurisdiction to the relevant authorities. Despite the legal obligation to comply with anti-money laundering regulations, professional accountants' adherence to these measures remains insufficient. Previous research on machine learning techniques for combating money laundering has predominantly concentrated on predicting suspicious transactions, rather than evaluating compliance behavior. This study aims to develop a machine learning prediction model to assess the inclination of professional accountants towards adhering to anti-money laundering regulations, serving as an early signal system to gauge their willingness to abide by the law in their professional responsibilities. The research elaborates on the design and implementation of machine learning models based on three algorithms: Decision Tree, Gradient Boosted Tree, and Support Vector Machine. The paper offers two types of comparisons from distinct perspectives: firstly, the performance of each algorithm in predicting real cases of anti-money laundering compliance, and secondly, the contribution of attributes measured by weights of correlation in different algorithms. Alongside demographic factors, the study evaluates the effectiveness of each algorithm in anti-money laundering compliance by utilizing five attributes derived from the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). The findings demonstrate the significance of all attributes, including demography and PMT, in all machine learning models, with both Gradient Boosted Tree and Support Vector Machine achieving a proportion of variance of 0.8 or higher. This indicates the potential of these algorithms in effectively measuring and predicting professional accountants' intentions to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.
© 2023 The Authors. Published by IASE.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Money laundering, Professional accountants, Anti-money laundering regulations, Machine learning prediction model, Compliance behavior
Article History: Received 25 January 2023, Received in revised form 9 March 2023, Accepted 10 May 2023
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the financial support granted by the Ministry of Higher Education under FRGS grant (600-IRMI/FRGS 5/3 (208/2019). We also appreciate Universiti Teknologi MARA for the full support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Citation:
Masrom S, Tarmizi MA, Halid S, Rahman RA, Rahman ASA, and Ibrahim R (2023). Machine learning in predicting anti-money laundering compliance with protection motivation theory among professional accountants. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(7): 48-53
Permanent Link to this page
Figures
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Tables
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4
----------------------------------------------
References (23)
- Achim MV and Borlea SN (2020). Economic and financial crime: Corruption, shadow economy, and money laundering. Volume 20, Springer Nature, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51780-9 [Google Scholar]
- Alkhalili M, Qutqut MH, and Almasalha F (2021). Investigation of applying machine learning for watch-list filtering in anti-money laundering. IEEE Access, 9: 18481-18496. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052313 [Google Scholar]
- BNM (2001). Legislation of Malaysia (Act, 613): Anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism financing and proceeds of unlawful activities act 2001. Bank Negara Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
- Canhoto AI (2021). Leveraging machine learning in the global fight against money laundering and terrorism financing: An affordances perspective. Journal of Business Research, 131: 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.012 [Google Scholar] PMid:33100427 PMCid:PMC7568127
- Chen Z, Van Khoa LD, Teoh EN, Nazir A, Karuppiah EK, and Lam KS (2018). Machine learning techniques for anti-money laundering (AML) solutions in suspicious transaction detection: A review. Knowledge and Information Systems, 57: 245-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1144-z [Google Scholar]
- Chenoweth T, Minch R, and Gattiker T (2009). Application of protection motivation theory to adoption of protective technologies. In the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Waikoloa, USA: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.74 [Google Scholar]
- GFI (2019). Illicit financial flows to and from 148 developing countries: 2006-2015. Global Financial Integrity, Washington, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Jullum M, Løland A, Huseby RB, Ånonsen G, and Lorentzen J (2020). Detecting money laundering transactions with machine learning. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23(1): 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2019-0055 [Google Scholar]
- Kothe EJ, Ling M, North M, Klas A, Mullan BA, and Novoradovskaya L (2019). Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(4): 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12271 [Google Scholar]
- Kowalski RM and Black KJ (2021). Protection motivation and the COVID-19 virus. Health Communication, 36(1): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847448 [Google Scholar] PMid:33190547
- Laptes R (2020). Combating money laundering: A mandatory topic for the professional accountant. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series V: Economic Sciences, 13(62): 141-146. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.es.2020.13.62.2.15 [Google Scholar]
- Lorenz J, Silva MI, Aparício D, Ascensão JT, and Bizarro P (2020). Machine learning methods to detect money laundering in the Bitcoin blockchain in the presence of label scarcity. In the 1st ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383455.3422549 [Google Scholar] PMid:32126388
- MENAFATF (2019). Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. Mutual Evaluation Report, Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF), Seef, Bahrain. [Google Scholar]
- Omar N, Johari ZA, and Arshad R (2014). Money laundering–FATF special recommendation VIII: A review of evaluation reports. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145: 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.029 [Google Scholar]
- Sarif SM, Maidin AJ, Ibrahim J, and Dahlan AR (2019). Effects of anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing law on innovation of mobile payment systems in Malaysia. In: Oseni UA, Hassan MK, and Hassan R (Eds.), Emerging issues in Islamic finance law and practice in Malaysia: 117-128. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-545-120191013 [Google Scholar]
- Schneider F and Windischbauer U (2008). Money laundering: Some facts. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9070-x [Google Scholar]
- Tarmizi MA, Zolkaflil S, Omar N, Hasnan S, and Nazri SM (2022). Compliance determinants of anti-money laundering regime among professional accountants in Malaysia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(2): 361-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2022-0003 [Google Scholar]
- Teichmann FMJ (2018). Real estate money laundering in Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 21(3): 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2017-0043 [Google Scholar]
- Terry LS and Llerena Robles JC (2018). The relevance of FATF's recommendations and fourth round of mutual evaluations to the legal profession. Fordham International Law Journal, 42(2): 627-728. [Google Scholar]
- Unger B, Siegel M, Ferwerda J, De Kruijf W, Busuioic M, Wokke K, and Rawlings G (2006). The amounts and the effects of money laundering. Ministry of Finance, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- Verkijika SF (2018). Understanding smartphone security behaviors: An extension of the protection motivation theory with anticipated regret. Computers and Security, 77: 860-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.03.008 [Google Scholar]
- Weber J and Kruisbergen EW (2019). Criminal markets: The dark web, money laundering and counterstrategies-An overview of the 10th research conference on organized crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 22(3): 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-019-09365-8 [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y and Trubey P (2019). Machine learning and sampling scheme: An empirical study of money laundering detection. Computational Economics, 54: 1043-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9864-z [Google Scholar]
|