Volume 10, Issue 4 (April 2023), Pages: 169-175

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

The phenomena of the use of the diglossia language in the learning interaction of Indonesian language: A case study of a junior high school in Cilegon City

 Author(s): 

 Erwin Salpa Riansi *, Suyitno, Retno Winarni, Raheni Suhita

 Affiliation(s):

 Department of Indonesian Language Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-9808

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.04.021

 Abstract:

This study was conducted to explain the phenomenon of the use of diglossia language which still often occurs in the learning environment. Thus, in order to provide a solution to these symptoms, it is necessary to first explain the phenomena that occur or are behind them. The phenomenon in the use of diglossia language occurs because of the process of cultural mixing in the use of language and the dualistic attitude shown by Indonesian language teachers, especially Indonesian language teachers at the Junior High School of Cilegon City. Based on the research that has been done, it was found that teachers have been stuck between following the rules of language or getting closer to students by ignoring the rules of language. It is known that today's students are very thick in the use of language that is influenced by the media, what they see on television, or social media. So that this phenomenon goes unnoticed by teachers and students in the learning process. The results of the study were found by using a phenomenological approach that focuses on the object of study on the situation or phenomenon behind it.

 © 2023 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Phenomenon, Diglossia, Learning interaction

 Article History: Received 21 October 2022, Received in revised form 18 January 2023, Accepted 28 January 2023

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Riansi ES, Suyitno, Winarni R, and Suhita R (2023). The phenomena of the use of the diglossia language in the learning interaction of Indonesian language: A case study of a junior high school in Cilegon City. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(4): 169-175

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 No Table 

----------------------------------------------    

 References (33)

1. Abdul C and Leonie A (2010). Sosiolinguistik perkenalan awal. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmad F and Barner-Rasmussen W (2019). False foe? When and how code switching practices can support knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 25(3): 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.03.002   [Google Scholar]
3. Amalia NR, Hidayah N, and Irwandani I (2020). Kemampuan komunikasi peserta didik sekolah dasar menggunakan strategi debat aktif. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v1i1.8043   [Google Scholar]
4. Aprilani A and Rohendi A (2020). Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan menulis warta bahasa sunda siswa kelas VIII melalui model pembelajaran tutorial sebaya. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia,1(2): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v1i2.9878   [Google Scholar]
5. Auer P (1984). Bilingual conversation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.8   [Google Scholar]
6. Cacoullos RT and Travis CE (2018). Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235259   [Google Scholar]
7. DeAndrea DC, Shaw AS, and Levine TR (2010). Online language: The role of culture in self-expression and self-construal on Facebook. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(4): 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10377989   [Google Scholar]
8. Diebold AR (1961). Incipient bilingualism. Language, 37(1): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/411253   [Google Scholar]
9. Eastman CM (1992). Codeswitching as an urban language‐contact phenomenon. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 13(1-2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1992.9994480   [Google Scholar]
10. Fishman JA (1997). The sociology of language. In: Coupland N and Jaworski A (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: 25–30. Palgrave, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_4   [Google Scholar]
11. Fishman JA (2006). A decalogue of basic theoretical perspectives for a sociology of language and religion. In: Fishman JA and Omoniyi T (Eds.), Explorations in the sociology of language and religion: 13-25. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands.https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.20.03fis   [Google Scholar]
12. Fowler R (2013). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge, London, UK.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002057   [Google Scholar]
13. Gal S (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. Academic Press, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
14. Gal S (1987). Codeswitching and consciousness in the European periphery. American Ethnologist, 14(4): 637-653. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1987.14.4.02a00030   [Google Scholar]
15. Gjicali K, Astuto J, and Lipnevich AA (2019). Relations among language comprehension, oral counting, and numeral knowledge of ethnic and racial minority young children from low-income communities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46: 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.07.007   [Google Scholar]
16. Haryati SI (2014). Variasi bahasa perdagangan di pasar keramat kabupaten sampit (Kalimantan tengah). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
17. Hasani A, Juansah DE, Sari IJ, and El Islami RA (2020). Conceptual frameworks on how to teach STEM concepts in Bahasa Indonesia subject as integrated learning in grades 1–3 at elementary school in the curriculum 2013 to contribute to sustainability education. Sustainability, 13(1): 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010173   [Google Scholar]
18. Haugen E (1950a). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2): 210-231. https://doi.org/10.2307/410058   [Google Scholar]
19. Haugen E (1950b). First grammatical treatise. The earliest Germanic phonology. Language, 26(4): 4-64.https://doi.org/10.2307/522272   [Google Scholar]
20. Heller M (1992). The politics of codeswitching and language choice. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 13(1-2): 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1992.9994487   [Google Scholar]
21. Heller M (2010). Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (Vol. 48). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.   [Google Scholar]
22. Indriyani N (2022). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa kelas VII pada konsep about public places melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 2(1): 46-51. https://doi.org/10.53889/jpig.v2i1.75   [Google Scholar]
23. Kurniasih S, Taufik AN, Nulhakim L, and Juansah DE (2022). Development of a biotechnology module to improve science communication skills toward society 5.0. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 8: 2.https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v8i2.17227   [Google Scholar]
24. Mackey WF (1962). The description of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 7(2): 51-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100019393   [Google Scholar]
25. Mukhtar M, El Islami RAZ, Damanhuri D, and Hamundu FM (2021). Information and communication technologies to improve problem solving and self-efficacy: Exploring geometry learning using dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.4   [Google Scholar]
26. Namaziandost E and Nasri M (2019). The impact of social media on EFL learners’ speaking skill: A survey study involving EFL teachers and students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(3): 199-215.   [Google Scholar]
27. Nisa WM and Wilujeng I (2020). Teaching science books based on bakpia local-potential to improve students’ critical thinking and communication skills. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(2): 283-301. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i2.8716   [Google Scholar]
28. Palmer DK (2008). Building and destroying students’ ‘academic identities’: The power of discourse in a two‐way immersion classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(6): 647-667.https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701470537   [Google Scholar]
29. Rahmawati F, Rahman A, and Usman U (2021). The effect of world cafe learning method on students’ oral communication competence in biology learning. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia,2(1): 48-59. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v2i1.10888   [Google Scholar]
30. Rimadani R (2022). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara pada konsep things around us melalui model discovery learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 2(1): 36-39. https://doi.org/10.53889/jpig.v2i1.73   [Google Scholar]
31. Rusyana Y (1989). Perihal kedwibahasaan (Bilingualisme). FPBS IKIP Bandung, Jakarta, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
32. Vogt H (1954). Language contacts. Word, 10(2-3): 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659533   [Google Scholar]
33. Wahyuni W (2022). Penggunaan metode sosiodrama untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berkomunikasi remaja denganorang tua dalam bimbingan kelompok. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 2(1): 40-45. https://doi.org/10.53889/jpig.v2i1.74   [Google Scholar]