International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 9, Issue 7 (July 2022), Pages: 186-193

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Analysis of current trends in introverted design: Changing the extraverted paradigm

 Author(s): Viktor Hleba 1, Oksana Poltavets–Huida 2, Tetiana Malik 2, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Environmental Design, Faculty of Design, Mykhailo Boichuk Kyiv State Academy of Decorative and Applied Arts and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine
 2Department of Environmental Design, Faculty of Design, Kyiv State Academy of Decorative and Applied Art and Design named after Mykhailo Boychuk, Kyiv, Ukraine

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-3957

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.07.019

 Abstract:

This research deals with the main characteristics of introverted design from the point of view of the modern perception of personality and its place in society. The main concepts of the personal classification of private and public space are highlighted, and the leading types of design focus on equal access to personal comfort. The essence, signs, and advantages of co-working as the latest model of interaction between people with different psychological types, worldviews, and cultural perceptions are revealed. The purpose of the study is to identify the main criteria for the formation of introverted design in modern space and to determine its impact on the emergence of new formats of interaction between the individual and the architectural space. This study used the method of systematic analysis of scientific papers and publications on the topic of research, the method of comparative analysis, as well as the generalization and systematization of the information obtained. The analysis of the source base on psychological aspects of design shows multi-vector and interdisciplinary approaches. There is a clear connection between design and psychology, caused by the increasing gravitation of artists towards individualization of projects, uniqueness, and maximum conformity with the needs of clients. The authors note a certain lack of clarity on the introverted design topic in scientific research specifically in the field of architecture and design: the growing actualization of the personal approach in all spheres of life requires a comprehensive and deep interdisciplinary analysis for further implementation in the design and architectural projects. The change of the extroverted paradigm focused on active communication between people, multitasking, openness, and non-zoning of space in a freer opened up new possibilities for the design and modeling of the interior. Thus, taking advantage of the achievements of psychology, sociology, and other related sciences, interior design can take into account the influence of a number of circumstances on the effectiveness of his work: the right choice of color scheme, taking into account for both the psycho-type of man and the purpose of the room and its location, increases productivity and increases the sense of harmony.

 © 2022 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Introvert, Architectural spaciousness, Introverted design, Personal boundaries, Co-working

 Article History: Received 17 November 2021, Received in revised form 12 February 2022, Accepted 29 April 2022

 Acknowledgment 

No acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Hleba V, Poltavets–Huida O, and Malik T (2022). Analysis of current trends in introverted design: Changing the extraverted paradigm. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(7): 186-193

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 No Table 

----------------------------------------------    

 References (35)

  1. Abd Elrahman AS and Asaad M (2021). Urban design and urban planning: A critical analysis to the theoretical relationship gap. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1): 1163-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.020   [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnheim R (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA‏.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamhdi A (2021). Requirements capture and comparative analysis of open source versus proprietary service oriented architecture. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 74: 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103468   [Google Scholar]
  4. Bechtel RB and Churchman A (2003). Handbook of environmental psychology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Bjerre J (2021). In the shadow of sociology: Bateson through the lens of Durkheim. Journal of Classical Sociology, 21(2): 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20944348   [Google Scholar]
  6. Cain S (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking. Broadway Books‏, Portland, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Chitturi R, Londono JC, and Amezquita CA (2019). The influence of color and shape of package design on consumer preference: The case of orange juice. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 5(2): 42-56‏. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.52.2003   [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook M (2021). Perceiving others: The psychology of interpersonal perception. Routledge, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173908   [Google Scholar]
  9. Csikszentmihalhi M (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Hachette, London, UK‏.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Giddens A (2013). The consequences of modernity. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA‏.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall ET (1963). A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65(5): 1003-1026. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00020   [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanada M (2018). Correspondence analysis of color–emotion associations. Color Research and Application, 43(2): 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22171   [Google Scholar]
  13. Hnatyshyn O and Kryvuts S (2020). Models of realization of the concept of «naturalness» in the interior design of hospitals for children. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-53-2-44   [Google Scholar]
  14. Holubchak K, Yu C, Savchuk T, and Negrych I (2019). The phenomenon of creative economy in Ukraine and defining its place in the architectural space. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 99: 73-78. https://doi.org/10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.15   [Google Scholar]
  15. Horney K (1994). The neurotic personality of our time. Routledge, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Jung C (2016). Psychological types. Routledge‏, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315512334   [Google Scholar]
  17. Karaca E and Karaca M (2021). Environmental psychology approaches within the relationship of nature and health in terms of landscape architecture. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(42): 5781-5802. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.910271   [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz I (2021). Architecture on the move: (Re) Creating a place in a displaced world. In: Seethaler-Wari S, Chitchian S, and Momic M (Eds.), Inhabiting Displacement: Architecture and authorship: 47-59.‏ Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035623710-005   [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindenthal T (2020). Beauty in the eye of the home‐owner: Aesthetic zoning and residential property values. Real Estate Economics, 48(2): 530-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12204   [Google Scholar]
  20. Lorne C (2020). The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(4): 747-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19876941   [Google Scholar]
  21. Lüscher M (1995). Signals of personality. MODEK, Voronezh, Russia.   [Google Scholar]
  22. Lynch K (1960). The image of the city. Volume 11, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  23. Mellander C and Florida R (2021). The rise of skills: Human capital, the creative class, and regional development. In: Fischer MM and Nijkamp P (Eds.), Handbook of regional science: 707-719. Springer, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_18   [Google Scholar]
  24. Park N and Peterson C (2010). Does it matter where we live? The urban psychology of character strengths. American Psychologist, 65(6): 535-‏547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019621   [Google Scholar] PMid:20822195
  25. Preston JL and Baimel A (2021). Towards a psychology of religion and the environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40: 145-149‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.013   [Google Scholar] PMid:33113462
  26. Semarkhanova EK, Bakhtiyarova LN, Krupoderova EP, Krupoderova KR, and Ponachugin AV (2017). Information technologies as a factor in the formation of the educational environment of a university. In the International conference on Humans as an Object of Study by Modern Science, Springer, Volgograd, Russia‏: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6_23   [Google Scholar]
  27. Shugrina M, Zhang W, Chevalier F, Fidler S, and Singh K (2019). Color builder: A direct manipulation interface for versatile color theme authoring. In the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300686   [Google Scholar]
  28. Sommer AE, Ortmann K, Van Heerden M, Richter T, Leadbeater T, Cole K, Heitkam S, Brito-Parada PR, and Eckert K (2020). Application of positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) to measure the bubble-particle interaction in a turbulent and dense flow. Minerals Engineering, 156: 106410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106410   [Google Scholar]
  29. Spence C (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive research: Principles and implications, 5(1): 1-26.‏ https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4   [Google Scholar] PMid:32945978 PMCid:PMC7501350
  30. Thorstenson CA, Elliot AJ, Pazda AD, Perrett DI, and Xiao D (2018). Emotion-color associations in the context of the face. Emotion, 18(7): 1032‏–1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000358   [Google Scholar] PMid:29172620
  31. Vecco M (2020). Genius loci as a meta-concept. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 41: 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.07.001   [Google Scholar]
  32. Veraldi R (2017). Tradition and modernity: Working culture in the Western model and Japanese model, as an expression of a cultural models: A first reading. Science and Philosophy, 5(2): 19-24.   [Google Scholar]‏
  33. Wang Z (2021). Research on commercial interior environment design based on computer aided design. In the 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education, Dalian, China: 247-278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3482632.3482689   [Google Scholar]
  34. Wettstein M, Wahl HW, and Schwenk M (2018). Life space in older adults. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.‏ Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.441   [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang L, VanDam KH, Majumdar A, Anvari B, Ochieng WY, and Zhang L (2019). Integrated design of transport infrastructure and public spaces considering human behavior: A review of state-of-the-art methods and tools. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(4): 429-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.08.003   [Google Scholar]