International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 9, Issue 2 (February 2022), Pages: 63-71

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: European green deal: Experience of food safety for Ukraine

 Author(s): Oleh V. Skydan 1, *, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych 2, Tetiana P. Fedoniuk 3, Yevhen M. Dankevych 4, Maryna I. Yaremova 5

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Innovative Entrepreneurship and Investment Activities, Polissia National University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
 2Department of International Economic Relations and European Integration, Polissia National University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
 3Educational and Scientific Department of Ecology and Environment Protection, Polissia National University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
 4Department of Environmental Safety and Environmental Economics, Polissia National University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
 5Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Polissia National University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-9620

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.02.007

 Abstract:

The systematization of European experience in the formation of food safety through research and analysis of European regulations and strategies. The key principles of the European Green Deal on food safety were analyzed, namely the implementation of the principle of sustainability of food systems and policies for adaptation to climate change. The levels of food safety of Ukraine and Poland were compared according to the main components: food availability, access to food, food safety conditions. According to the results of a sociological study, the level of food safety of Ukraine in terms of the introduction of the land market was assessed. A portrait of a landowner was formed, and the presence of a land plot affects the state of food supply. Based on the analysis of the main provisions of the European Green Deal and food safety policy (on the example of Poland), the areas of increasing the level of food safety in Ukraine were identified: completion of land reform and lifting the moratorium on the sale of agricultural land; ensuring the production of value-added products; adaptation to climate change, development, and implementation of a national program for rural development. 

 © 2022 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: European green deal, Agricultural policy, Food safety, Bioeconomy, Land reform, Climate change

 Article History: Received 24 June 2021, Received in revised form 28 August 2021, Accepted 3 December 2021

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Skydan OV, Dankevych VY, and Fedoniuk TP et al. (2022). European green deal: Experience of food safety for Ukraine. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(2): 63-71

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5  

----------------------------------------------    

 References (24)

  1. Antamoshkina EN and Rogachev AF (2020). The model of statistical assessment of food security. In: Bogoviz A (Ed.), Complex systems: Innovation and sustainability in the digital age: 471-479. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44703-8_51   [Google Scholar]
  2. Bovsh LA and Komarnits'kyy IO (2018). Evaluating the quality of food service products in shopping centers. Bulletin of Mukachevo State University: Series “Economy”, 1(9): 47-52. https://doi.org/10.31339/2313-8114-2018-1(9)-47-52   [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulanda-Jansen A (2019). Evolution of the metropolitan area of Shenzhen, analysis: From theory to selected examples. In the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 471(11): 112058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112058   [Google Scholar]
  4. Deinlnger K and Binswanger H (1999). The evolution of the world bank's land policy: Principles, experience, and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2): 247-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/14.2.247   [Google Scholar]
  5. Ecker O (2018). Agricultural transformation and food and nutrition security in Ghana: Does farm production diversity (still) matter for household dietary diversity? Food Policy, 79: 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.08.002   [Google Scholar]
  6. FAO (2019). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2019: Safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Golodnikov AN, Ermol’ev YM, Ermol’eva TY, Knopov PS, and Pepelyaev VA (2013). Integrated modeling of food security management in Ukraine: II. Models for structural optimization of agricultural production under risk. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 49(2): 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-013-9503-6   [Google Scholar]
  8. Haysom G and Tawodzera G (2018). “Measurement drives diagnosis and response”: Gaps in transferring food security assessment to the urban scale. Food Policy, 74: 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.12.001   [Google Scholar]
  9. Hou J, Huo X, and Yin R (2017). Land rental market participation and its impact on fixed investment and household welfare: Evidence from Chinese apple production sites. Sustainability, 9(11): 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111961   [Google Scholar]
  10. Kozlovskyi S, Baidala V, Tkachuk O, and Kozyrska T (2018). Management of the sustainable development of the agrarian sector of the regions of Ukraine. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-4.12   [Google Scholar]
  11. Ma E, Cai J, Lin J, Guo H, Han Y, and Liao L (2020). Spatio-temporal evolution of global food security pattern and its influencing factors in 2000-2014. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(2): 332–347.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Mishchuk H, Bilan S, Yurchyk H, Akimova L, and Navickas M (2020). Impact of the shadow economy on social safety: The experience of Ukraine. Economics and Sociology, 13(2): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/19   [Google Scholar]
  13. Mohammadi R and Yavar G (2015). The effect of aggregate measurement of support on urban households’ food security index in Iran. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 8(1): 193-202. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/599   [Google Scholar]
  14. Nesengani TJ and Yusuf FSG (2020). Assessing agricultural extension support on the food security projects in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology, 69(1–3): 147–151. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566608.2020/69.1-3.3199   [Google Scholar]
  15. Panukhnyk O, Popadynets N, and Fedotova Y (2019). Analysis and modeling of factor determinants of food provision at consumer market of Ukraine. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 5(Special Issue): 215-226.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Plotnikova SP, Kiyan TV, Mikheeva NB, and Kravtsov DI (2020). Production of organic products as a modern factor of food security. In the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 548(2): 022050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022050   [Google Scholar]
  17. Pronko L, Furman I, Kucher A, and Gontaruk Y (2020). Formation of a state support program for agricultural producers in Ukraine considering world experience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1): 364–379. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p364   [Google Scholar]
  18. Pruntseva G, Popadynets N, Barna M, Stetsiv I, Stetsiv I, Yakubiv V, Shymanovska-Dianych L, Fedotova Y, Karpiak M, and Hryhoruk I (2021). The impact of governance on agricultural production as an exclusive factor of the country’s food security. Accounting, 7(1): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.10.012   [Google Scholar]
  19. Shevchenko А, Feshchenko D, Zghozinska O, Sachuk R, Stravsky Ya, and Chala I (2020). Problems of quality of raw milk and their overcoming by dipping procedures with Forticept® drugs. Scientific Horizons, 23(9): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.23(9).2020.21-29   [Google Scholar]
  20. Smachylo V, Khalina V, Kolmakova O, Ustilovska A, and Synilo O (2020). The influence of social entrepreneurship on the labor market. Scientific Horizons, 8(93): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.33249/2663-2144-2020-93-8-79-88   [Google Scholar]
  21. Tolmachev M, Tsypin A, and Barashov N (2020). Statistical study of dynamics of the agricultural production of post-soviet countries in the context. In the International Scientific Conference on FarEastCon, Vladivostok, Russia: 172: 699-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2244-4_66   [Google Scholar]
  22. Voronych М (2019). Results of analytical reviews of agricultural export of Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 11(84): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.33249/2663-2144-2019-84-11-41-50   [Google Scholar]
  23. Vranken L and Swinnen J (2006). Land rental markets in transition: Theory and evidence from Hungary. World Development, 34(3): 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.017   [Google Scholar]
  24. Yadav K and Congalton RG (2018). Accuracy assessment of global food security-support analysis data (GFSAD) cropland extent maps produced at three different spatial resolutions. Remote Sensing, 10(11): 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111800   [Google Scholar]