International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 8, Issue 5 (May 2021), Pages: 30-43

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: The effect of different sharing patterns through multiple electronic approaches on developing information awareness and social interaction skills among students of the University of Hail

 Author(s): Shawky Mohamed Mahmoud *, Osama Mohamed Abdel Salam, Sahaby Boubaker

 Affiliation(s):

 Community College, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-821x

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.05.004

 Abstract:

The current research aims at identifying the effect of different patterns of sharing in the electronic learning environment on developing information awareness and social interaction skills among students of the University of Hail. The research sample consisted of 18 students from the Department of Computer Science at the Community College-University of Hail, who was chosen and distributed randomly on three groups, the researchers designed the participatory e-learning environment model, and in light of the activity theory. The research experiment lasted three weeks. The students of the three groups studied the proposed scientific content through the “Black Board” learning management system, then the students performed an activity participatory implementation of the activities and tasks of the scientific content through the use of a cooperative learning strategy, with a different style of participation, as the first group students participated in the synergistic sharing pattern through the Web 2.0 tool (Twitter), and the second experimental group students with the parallel sharing style through the Web 2.0 tool (Video Sharing), and the students of the third experimental group in the style of sequential sharing through the Web 2.0 tool (Wiki). The results showed the effectiveness of the three types of participation (synergistic-parallel-serial) in developing information awareness and social interaction skills in favor of post-performance. On the other hand, the two modes of participation (synergistic and sequential) were superior to that of (parallel) in the development of cognitive achievement of information awareness. More Attention should be considered in designing and producing digital courses based on participatory learning systems. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Virtual e-learning environment, Patterns of sharing, Information awareness, Social interaction skills

 Article History: Received 5 October 2020, Received in revised form 12 December 2020, Accepted 15 January 2021

 Acknowledgment 

The current research was sponsored under project number (160893) by the deanship of scientific research, university of Hai’l.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

  Mahmoud SM, Salam OMA, and Boubaker S (2021). The effect of different sharing patterns through multiple electronic approaches on developing information awareness and social interaction skills among students of the University of Hail. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(5): 30-43

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 

----------------------------------------------

 References (20)

  1. Adu-Gyamfi K, Ampiah JG, and Agyei DD (2020). Participatory teaching and learning approach: A framework for teaching redox reactions at high school level. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1): 106-120. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120   [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsaqri SH, Alkwiese MJ, and Dayrit RD (2018). Impact of social Networking sites on study habits among Saudi Nursing Students in Hail University. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(4): 100-108. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.04.013   [Google Scholar]
  3. Alshamari SA and Aichouni M (2020). Mobile applications for quality improvement in technical and vocational education: A case study of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(12): 56-61. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.12.006   [Google Scholar]
  4. Blayone TJ, Barber W, DiGiuseppe M, and Childs E (2017). Democratizing digital learning: Theorizing the fully online learning community model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0051-4   [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolatli Z and Korucu AT (2018). Secondary school students' feedback on course processing and collaborative learning with web 2.0 tools-supported STEM activities. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2): 456-478. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.358488   [Google Scholar]
  6. Gursoy G and Goksun DO (2019). The experiences of pre-service science teachers in educational content development using web 2.0 tools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4): 338-357. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634168   [Google Scholar]
  7. Hadwin A, Järvelä S, and Miller M (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In: Schunk DH and Green JA (Eds.), Handbook of self-rgulationof learning and performance: 83-106. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6   [Google Scholar]
  8. Heinimäki OP, Volet S, and Vauras M (2020). Core and activity-specific functional participatory roles in collaborative science learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(2): 65-89. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i2.469   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ismaile S and Alhosban F (2018). Students perceptions of audience response system in classroom feedback: A qualitative study. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(4): 67-72. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.04.008   [Google Scholar]
  10. Ivlev VY, Barkova EV, Ivleva MI, and Buzskaya OM (2016). Environmental approach to the study of the modern stage of information society development: Research prospects. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16): 9113-9124.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaplan S (2002). Strategies for collaborative learning building e-learning and blended learning communities. Available online at: http://www.icohere.com/collaborativelear-ning.htm
  12. Karasavvidis I (2008). Activity theory as a theoretical framework for the study of blended learning: A case study. In the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, Halkidiki, Greece: 195-202.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Krtalic M, Marcetic H, and Micunovic M (2016). Personal digital information archiving among students of social sciences and humanities. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 21(2). Available online at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1104374
  14. Onbasili ÜI (2020). The effects of science teaching practice supported with web 2.0 tools on prospective elementary school teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2): 91-110. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.7   [Google Scholar]
  15. Saborit JAP, Fernández-Río J, Estrada JAC, Méndez-Giménez A, and Alonso DM (2016). Teachers' attitude and perception towards cooperative learning implementation: Influence of continuing training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59: 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.020   [Google Scholar]
  16. Shahzad A, Reba A, and Khattak UR (2020). Effects of transition technique on motivation of the students at secondary level. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(11): 97-101. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.11.010   [Google Scholar]
  17. Vygotsky LS (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang SL and Hwang GJ (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers and Education, 58(2): 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003   [Google Scholar]
  19. Yueh HP, Huang JY, and Chang C (2015). Exploring factors affecting students’ continued Wiki use for individual and collaborative learning: An extended UTAUT perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1): 16-31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.170   [Google Scholar]
  20. Zainol A and Almukadi WS (2020). Implementing problem-based learning in the software engineering course. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(12): 19-26. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.12.002   [Google Scholar]