International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 7, Issue 4 (April 2020), Pages: 107-112

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Impact of most correlated risk factors into actual construction price in PPP projects

 Author(s): Yahya Alfraidi 1, *, Saleh Mohammed Alzahrani 2

 Affiliation(s):

 1Architecture Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Hail University, Hail, Saudi Arabia
 2Civil Engineering Department, University of Business and Technology–UBT, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8654-6797

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.04.014

 Abstract:

The basis of the formulation of most of the Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) is the reasoning that the public authority authorizes the design, construction, operation, maintenance, and funding of a public infrastructure project from a private group through a single contractual agreement. In general, PPP project risks consist of developing and building a new asset and ensuring that it remains functional for many decades. Exceeding the cost and time limits is possibly the most severe implication of risks throughout the construction period. Such events are the most extensively discussed situations in value for money risk analysis. There are changes in the sources of risk across the life cycle of a PPP project. In certain situations, the importance of construction and development risks in infrastructure projects is quite high. It is believed that projects pertaining to IT, rehabilitation/refurbishments, and complex agencies’ interaction have considerably greater risks compared to other assets. PPP construction risks have been categorized by Standard and Poor in accordance with the kind of assets, indicating that the funding bodies acknowledge the presence of a relationship between construction risks and kinds of PPP assets. Usually, all price distress has to be covered by the public sector from these risks in conventional procurement. There is sufficient evidence to imply that in a few of the projects that are completed under the public procurement systems, public distress is normal. The effect of risk factors on the precise construction price in PPP projects will be determined in this paper. In addition, it will present the correlation between the risk factors and the precise construction price units in PPP projects. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Impact of risks, Public-private partnership, Price overrun

 Article History: Received 20 November 2019, Received in revised form 26 January 2020, Accepted 28 January 2020

 Acknowledgment:

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Alfraidi Y and Alzahrani SM (2020). Impact of most correlated risk factors into actual construction price in PPP projects. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(4): 107-112

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 

 Tables

 No Table

----------------------------------------------

 References (11) 

  1. Bing L, Akintoye A, Edwards PJ, and Hardcastle C (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1): 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006   [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond G and Carter L (1994). Financing private infrastructure projects: Emerging trends from IFC's experience. The World Bank, Washington, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies J (2006). Risk transfer in private finance initiatives (PFIS): An economic analysis. Industrial Economic and Statistics Directorate (IES) Working Paper, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao SS and Handley-Schachler M (2004). Public bodies’ perceptions on risk transfer in the UK’s private finance initiative. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 3(1): 25-39.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimsey D and Lewis MK (2002). Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5   [Google Scholar]
  6. Hodge GA and Greve C (2007). Public–private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3): 545-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x   [Google Scholar]
  7. Ibrahim AD, Price ADF, and Dainty ARJ (2006). The analysis and allocation of risks in public private partnerships in infrastructure projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(3): 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664380680001086   [Google Scholar]
  8. Karim NAA (2011). Risk allocation in public private partnership (PPP) project: A review on risk factors. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 2(2): 8-16.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ke Y, Wang S, and Chan AP (2010). Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: Comparative study. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(4): 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000030   [Google Scholar]
  10. Victoria P (2001). Risk allocation and contractual issues. Department of Treasury and Finance, Melbourne, Australia.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Witt E (2010). Procurement arrangements and risk transfer in construction projects-initial evidence from Estonia. In the International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, Vilnius, Lithuania, 10: 549-556.   [Google Scholar]