International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 7, Issue 3 (March 2020), Pages: 55-63

----------------------------------------------

 Original research Paper

 Title: Women’s entry into the corporate community at the board level

 Author(s): Sivapalan Selvadurai 1, *, Bahiyah Abdul Hamid 1, Geraldine K. L. Chan 1, Mazni Yahya 2, Sook Fuang Foo 3

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia
 2National Institute for the Empowerment of Women (NIEW), Ministry of Women, Family and Social Development, Malaysia
 3Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-9187

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.03.007

 Abstract:

Women’s entry onto board positions has often paid greater attention to the manifest outcome of representation by way of examining the rate of representation, targets achieved as well as contending quantitative and economic measures of board effectiveness. However, few studies have examined how women gain entry onto boards. There is also a lack of qualitative and non-economic studies. This can be attributed to the exclusive focus on human capital and social network theories and quantitative methodology, ignoring the complexities of personal-social-institutional and board dynamics. In view of this gap in the literature, a theoretical discourse on human capital theory and resource-based theory is explored and its relevance to women directors’ gaining entry onto boards is discussed. The aim of this paper is to explore how women gain entry onto the PLC (Public Listed Companies) boards in Malaysia. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with five (5) women directors as participants and with three (3) male directors as key informants representing public listed companies in Malaysia were undertaken and analyzed. The findings revealed several factors that enable women to gain entry onto boards, namely personal characteristics, corporate experience, social networks and institutional factors. The ability to re-engineer oneself was found to be a critical personal factor in gaining entry onto boards, besides education and specialization in certain fields. Corporate strategic experience appears to be a critical strategic space for women to gain entry onto boards, besides the conventional top corporate positions. Also, there is great importance in the need for adequate corporate exposure to enhance women’s chances to gain board ship status. The social network was reaffirmed as was in previous studies. These findings provide a partial claim for the resource-based theory and provide a more nuanced understanding of experience as part of human capital stock in human capital theory. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Women directors, Board, Human capital, Resource-based theory, Strategic experience

 Article History: Received 11 August 2019, Received in revised form 26 December 2019, Accepted 28 December 2019

 Acknowledgment:

The authors would like to thank the SK-2017-002 Research Grant, led by Professor Dr. Fuad Mat Jali, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for the financial support given to the high impact publication project. This research project was funded by the grant GUP-2017-080 led by Associate Professor Geraldine K.L. Chan. We would also like to thank NIEW (NAM Institute for the Empowerment of Women) for their advice, counsel as well as collaborating in and facilitating this study.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Selvadurai S, Hamid BA, and Chan GKL et al. (2020). Women’s entry into the corporate community at the board level. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(3): 55-63

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 No Table

----------------------------------------------

 References (41) 

  1. Abdullah SN, Zainal AH, Abu BI, and Rahman AU (2016). The appointment process for independent directors in Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14: 519-531. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c3p12   [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams RB and Ferreira D (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2): 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007   [Google Scholar]
  3. Aldrich HE (1999). Organisations evolving. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez SA and Busenitz LW (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6): 755-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700609   [Google Scholar]
  5. Arfken DE, Bellar SL, and Helms MM (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business ethics, 50(2): 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98   [Google Scholar]
  6. Bear S, Rahman N, and Post C (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2): 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2   [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker G (1964). Human capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernardi RA and Threadgill VH (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. EJBO: Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, 15(2): 15-21.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Burgess Z and Tharenou P (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1): 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014726001155   [Google Scholar]
  10. Burke RJ (2000). Company size, board size and numbers of women corporate directors. In: Burke RJ and Mattis MC (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: 157-167. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4   [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan GK, Hamid BDA, and Selvadurai S (2017). Enablers and constraints of women empowerment as corporate board members in Malaysia. In the 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, Bangi, Malaysia: 1055-1063.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Coates TT and McDermott CM (2002). An exploratory analysis of new competencies: A resource based view perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5): 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00023-2   [Google Scholar]
  13. Einzenberger R (2016). "If it's on the internet it must be right": An interview with Myanmar ICT for development organisation on the use of the internet and social media in Myanmar. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2): 301-310.   [Google Scholar]
  14. Finkelstein S and Hambrick DC (1988). Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6): 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090603   [Google Scholar]
  15. Glass C, Cook A, and Ingersoll AR (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7): 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879   [Google Scholar]
  16. Großmann K, Padmanabhan M, and von Braun K (2017). Contested development in Indonesia: Rethinking ethnicity and gender in mining. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 10(1): 11-28.   [Google Scholar]
  17. Gul FA, Hutchinson M, and Lai KM (2013). Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 27(3): 511-538. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50486   [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamzah N, Mohd Saleh N, and Mohamed S (2012). The influence of ethnicity on IC reporting. Cambridge Business and Economics Conference. Cambridge, UK: 1-12.   [Google Scholar]
  19. Heis A (2015). The alternative agriculture network Isan and its struggle for food sovereignty: A food regime perspective of agricultural relations of production in Northeast Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 8(1): 67-86.   [Google Scholar]
  20. Huse M (2011). The golden skirts: Changes in board composition following gender quotas on corporate boards. In the Australian and New Zealand Academy Meeting, Wellington, New Zealand: 1-19.   [Google Scholar]
  21. Kesner IF (1988). Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1): 66-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/256498   [Google Scholar]
  22. Mallin CA (2004). Corporate governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  23. Malmberg H and Nordquist J (2001). The board of directors as a strategic resource in small ICT corporations. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Business Administration and Management, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.   [Google Scholar]
  24. Matthies A (2017). Community-based disaster risk management in the Philippines: Achievements and challenges of the Purok system. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 10(1): 101-108.   [Google Scholar]
  25. McGregor J (1997). Making the good woman visible: The issue of profile in New Zealand corporate directorship. International Review of Women and Leadership, 3(2): 1-10.   [Google Scholar]
  26. Nor HM and Ismail KNIK (2017). The moderating effects of independent directors’ human capital on the relationship between related party transactions and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. UKM Journal of Management, 51: 37-52. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2017-51-04   [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Neal D and Thomas H (1995). Director networks/director selection: The board's strategic role. European Management Journal, 13(1): 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(94)00060-K   [Google Scholar]
  28. Perrault E (2015). Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1): 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2092-0   [Google Scholar]
  29. Phaholyothin N (2017). Moving beyond charity to philanthropy? The case of charitable giving in Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 10(2): 185-203.   [Google Scholar]
  30. Pollak M (2000). Catalyst corporate board placement: New seats at the table. In: Burke RJ and Mattis MC (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: 263-269. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4_18   [Google Scholar]
  31. Rahman IMA and Ismail KNIK (2018). The moderating effect of culture on the relationship between women directors and CSR disclosure in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2018-09-12   [Google Scholar]
  32. Rantamäki-Lahtinen L (2009). The success of the diversified farm: Resource-based view. Agricultural and food science. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.5969   [Google Scholar]
  33. Sahari S, Hamzah N, Hassan MS, Ridhuan M, and Rahman CA (2018). The development of a human rights disclosure index. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5): 459-479. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i5/4119   [Google Scholar]
  34. Sheridan A (2001). A view from the top: Women on the boards of public companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(1): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005456   [Google Scholar]
  35. Shrader CB, Blackburn V, and Iles P (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3): 355-372.   [Google Scholar]
  36. Simpeh KN (2011). Entrepreneurship theories and Empirical research: A summary review of the literature. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(6): 1-8.   [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh V, Terjesen S, and Vinnicombe S (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1): 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.10.002   [Google Scholar]
  38. Terjesen S, Sealy R, and Singh V (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3): 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x   [Google Scholar]
  39. Tharenou P, Latimer S, and Conroy D (1994). How do you make it to the top? An examination of influences on women's and men's managerial advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4): 899-931. https://doi.org/10.5465/256604   [Google Scholar]
  40. Viviers S, Mans-Kemp N, and Fawcett R (2017). Mechanisms to promote board gender diversity in South Africa. Acta Commercii, 17(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v17i1.489   [Google Scholar]
  41. Westphal JD and Milton LP (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2): 366-398. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667075   [Google Scholar]