International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 7, Issue 12 (December 2020), Pages: 27-42

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Pounding response of two adjacent planar structures with different floor levels due to earthquake excitation using the finite element method

 Author(s): Hoa P. Hoang 1, Trung D. Pham 2, *, Hien M. Le 2, Phuoc T. Nguyen 3

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Road and Bridge Engineering, Da Nang University of Science and Technology, Da Nang, Vietnam
 2Department of Civil Engineering, Mientrung University of Civil Engineering, Tuy Hoa City, Vietnam
 3Department of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-0640

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.12.003

 Abstract:

Recently, dynamic excitation loads often cause damages in the adjacent structures with different dynamic characters through the pounding effect. This study analyzes the pounding response of the two adjacent structures with different floor levels associated with earthquake excitation. The structure system model was built based on the finite element method, and the governing equation of the structure system motion was established based on the dynamic balancing principle and solved by the New mark method in the time domain. The results indicate that the characteristic parameters significantly affect the dynamic response of the structure system. This study also shows that the pounding effect causes damages to the adjacent structure. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Adjacent structures, Earthquake-induced pounding, Different floor levels, Impact force, Finite element method

 Article History: Received 2 March 2020, Received in revised form 1 July 2020, Accepted 15 July 2020

 Acknowledgment:

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

  Hoang HP, Pham TD, and Le HM et al. (2020). Pounding response of two adjacent planar structures with different floor levels due to earthquake excitation using the finite element method. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(12): 27-42

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 15 

 Fig. 16 Fig. 17 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 Fig. 20 Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 23 Fig. 24 Fig. 25 Fig. 26 Fig. 27 Fig. 28 

 Tables

 No Table

----------------------------------------------

 References (37)

  1. Agarwal VK, Niedzwecki JM, and Van de Lindt JW (2007). Earthquake induced pounding in friction varying base isolated buildings. Engineering Structures, 29(11): 2825-2832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.026   [Google Scholar]
  2. Anagnostopoulos SA (1988). Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16(3): 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160311   [Google Scholar]
  3. Anagnostopoulos SA (1994). Earthquake induced pounding: State of the art. In the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, Vienna, Austria, 2: 897-905.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Anagnostopoulos SA (2004). Equivalent viscous damping for modeling inelastic impacts in earthquake pounding problems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33(8): 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.377   [Google Scholar]
  5. Anagnostopoulos SA and Spiliopoulos KV (1992). An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(4): 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210402   [Google Scholar]
  6. Chau KT, Wei XX, Shen CY, and Wang LX (2004). Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic torsional poundings between two adjacent structures. In the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada: 1-6.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Efraimiadou S, Hatzigeorgiou GD, and Beskos DE (2012). Structural pounding between adjacent buildings: the effects of different structures configurations and multiple earthquakes. In the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal: 24-28.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Efraimiadou S, Hatzigeorgiou GD, and Beskos DE (2013a). Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions, Part I: The effect of different structures arrangement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(10): 1509-1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2285   [Google Scholar]
  9. Efraimiadou S, Hatzigeorgiou GD, and Beskos DE (2013b). Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions, Part II: The effect of multiple earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(10): 1529-1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2284   [Google Scholar]
  10. Favvata MJ, Naoum MC, and Karayannis CG (2013). Earthquake induced interaction between RC frame and steel frame structures. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 134: 839-851. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE130741   [Google Scholar]
  11. Hameed A, Saleem M, Qazi AU, Saeed S, and Bashir MA (2012). Mitigation of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings. Pakistan Journal of Science, 64(4): 326-333.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatzigeorgiou GD and Pnevmatikos NG (2014). On the seismic response of collided structures. International Journal of Civil, Architectural, Structural and Construction Engineering, 8: 750-754.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Jankowski R (2005a). Impact force spectrum for damage assessment of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Key Engineering Materials, 293-294: 711-718. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.293-294.711   [Google Scholar]
  14. Jankowski R (2005b). Non‐linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake‐induced structural pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(6): 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.434   [Google Scholar]
  15. Jankowski R (2006a). Analytical expression between the impact damping ratio and the coefficient of restitution in the non‐linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(4): 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.537   [Google Scholar]
  16. Jankowski R (2006b). Pounding force response spectrum under earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures, 28(8): 1149-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.005   [Google Scholar]
  17. Jankowski R (2007). Assessment of damage due to earthquake-induced pounding between the main building and the stairway tower. Key Engineering Materials, 347: 339-344. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.347.339   [Google Scholar]
  18. Jankowski R (2008). Earthquake-induced pounding between equal height buildings with substantially different dynamic properties. Engineering Structures, 30(10): 2818-2829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.006   [Google Scholar]
  19. Jankowski R (2010). Experimental study on earthquake‐induced pounding between structural elements made of different building materials. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(3): 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.941   [Google Scholar]
  20. Jankowski R and Mahmoud S (2015). Earthquake-induced structural pounding. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16324-6   [Google Scholar]
  21. Karayannis CG and Favvata MJ (2005). Earthquake‐induced interaction between adjacent reinforced concrete structures with non‐equal heights. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.398   [Google Scholar]
  22. Kasai K and Maison BF (1997). Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Engineering Structures, 19(3): 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00082-X   [Google Scholar]
  23. Komodromos P, Polycarpou PC, Papaloizou L, and Phocas MC (2007). Response of seismically isolated buildings considering poundings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(12): 1605-1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.692   [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar P and Karuna S (2015). Effect of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings and mitigation measures. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(7): 208-216. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0407034   [Google Scholar]
  25. Li P, Liu S, and Lu Z (2017). Studies on pounding response considering structure-soil-structure interaction under seismic loads. Sustainability, 9(12): 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122219   [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu C, Yang W, Yan Z, Lu Z, and Luo N (2017). Base pounding model and response analysis of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation. Applied Sciences, 7(12): 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121238   [Google Scholar]
  27. López-Almansa F and Kharazian A (2014). Parametric study of the pounding effect between adjacent RC buildings with aligned slabs. In the 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology: 15th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey: 1-12.   [Google Scholar]
  28. Mahmoud S, Abd-Elhamed A, and Jankowski R (2013). Earthquake-induced pounding between equal height multi-storey buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(4): 1021-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9411-6   [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahmoud S, Austrell PE, and Jankowski R (2012). Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(3): 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0127-z   [Google Scholar]
  30. Mattia L, Stefano S, and Gloria T (2015). Nonlinear modeling and mitigation of seismic pounding between RC frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 19(3): 431-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.984370   [Google Scholar]
  31. Naderpour H, Barros RC, Khatami SM, and Jankowski R (2016). Numerical study on pounding between two adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Shock and Vibration, 2016: 1504783. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1504783   [Google Scholar]
  32. Namboothiri VP (2017). Seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(3): 1443-1448.   [Google Scholar]
  33. Raheem SEA (2014). Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(4): 1705-1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9592-2   [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosenblueth E and Meli R (1986). The 1985 Mexico earthquake. Concrete International, 8(5): 23-34.   [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruangrassamee A and Kawashima K (2001). Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(10): 1511-1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.75   [Google Scholar]
  36. Trung PD, Quang PT, Toan NB, Hoa HP, and Phuoc NT (2018). The effectiveness of rubber absorber in adjacent planar structures under earthquake-included pounding. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8): 1751-1768.   [Google Scholar]
  37. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, and Ghazizadeh S (2012). A probabilistic performance-based risk assessment approach for seismic pounding with efficient application to linear systems. Structural Safety, 36: 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.002   [Google Scholar]