International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 7, Issue 10 (October 2020), Pages: 102-107

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Advancement on enterprise risk management and supply chain performance

 Author(s): Ali Alhosani *, Norhayati Zakuan

 Affiliation(s):

 Azman Hashim International Business School, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Johor, Malaysia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-5745

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.10.011

 Abstract:

The Supply chain enterprise risk management and culture are the objectives of every company. However, supply development as vulnerability affects the proper handling of enterprise risks. This affects Supply Chain Performance (SCP) among citizens and stakeholders. In order to eliminate failure and create benefits, enterprise risk management demands accurate measurement. Companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have become more vulnerable to an increasing number of supply chain threats, but curiously most of them have not taken actions to institutionalize a risk culture to create risk-aware mindset in their employees. Data were collected using selected databases, specifically Springer, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The aim of this research is to propose an advancement of enterprise risk management (ERM) and SCP using a survey approach in order to fill gaps in knowledge. The contribution will benefit UAE manufacturing companies, especially for ERM and SCP effectiveness and Government. Also, salient factors useful to ERM and SCP for handling RMC are identified. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Advancement, Enterprise risk management, Risk management culture, Supply chain performance

 Article History: Received 1 December 2019, Received in revised form 3 May 2020, Accepted 11 June 2020

 Acknowledgment:

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Alhosani A and Zakuan N (2020). Advancement on enterprise risk management and supply chain performance. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(10): 102-107

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 

 Tables

 Table 1 

----------------------------------------------

 References (36)

  1. Akkermans H and Van Wassenhove LN (2018). Supply chain tsunamis: Research on low‐probability, high‐impact disruptions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(1): 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12162   [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, and Othman SH (2018). Model derivation system to manage database forensic investigation domain knowledge. In the IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security, IEEE, Langkawi, Malaysia: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS.2018.8631468   [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, Othman SH, Choo KKR, Glisson WB, Ali A, and Abrar M (2017a). CDBFIP: Common database forensic investigation processes for internet of things. IEEE Access, 5: 24401-24416. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2762693   [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, Othman SH, Ngadi A, Ahmed MN, and Mohammed AA (2017b). Development and validation of a database forensic metamodel (DBFM). PloS One, 12(2): e0170793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170793   [Google Scholar] PMid:28146585 PMCid:PMC5287479
  5. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak SA, and Othman SH (2015). Common investigation process model for database forensic investigation discipline. In the 1st ICRIL-International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 297-300.   [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak SA, Othman SH, Nagdi A, and Ali A (2016). A generic database forensic investigation process model. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-11): 45-57. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9190   [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Dhaqm AMR, Othman SH, Razak SA, and Ngadi A (2014). Towards adapting metamodelling technique for database forensics investigation domain. In the International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies, IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013142   [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali A, Razak SA, Othman SH, and Mohammed A (2017a). Extraction of common concepts for the mobile forensics domain. In the International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Johor Bahru, Malaysia: 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_16   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ali A, Razak SA, Othman SH, Mohammed A, and Saeed F (2017b). A metamodel for mobile forensics investigation domain. PloS One, 12(4): e0176223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176223   [Google Scholar] PMid:28445486 PMCid:PMC5433730
  10. Alvarez AVB (2018). The influence of climate on supply chain risk management. Ph.D. Dissertation, Escola De Administração De Empresas De São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Berg E, Knudsen D, and Norrman A (2008). Assessing performance of supply chain risk management programmes: A tentative approach. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 9(3): 288-310. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2008.019746   [Google Scholar]
  12. Christopher M (2016). Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson, London‎, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Sayegh SM (2008). Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4): 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004   [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan Y and Stevenson M (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 48: 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0043   [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldsby TJ, Michael Knemeyer A, Miller JW, and Wallenburg CM (2013). Measurement and moderation: Finding the boundary conditions in logistics and supply chain research. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2): 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12013   [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurnani H, Mehrotra A, and Ray S (2012). Erratum to: Supply chain disruptions. In: Gurnani H, Mehrotra A, and Ray S (Eds.), Supply Chain Disruptions. Springer, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-778-5   [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatani F (2010). Flexible strategy mix for central Europe: A process data analysis. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(6): 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20382   [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendricks KB and Singhal VR (2007). The effect of demand-supply mismatches on equity volatility: An analysis of different types of supply chain risks. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2PiHKSu
  19. Ho W, Zheng T, Yildiz H, and Talluri S (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16): 5031-5069. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467   [Google Scholar]
  20. Horvath L (2001). Collaboration: The key to value creation in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6: 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006039   [Google Scholar]
  21. Jin Y, Hopkins MM, and Wittmer JL (2010). Linking human capital to competitive advantages: Flexibility in a manufacturing firm's supply chain. Human Resource Management, 49(5): 939-963. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20385   [Google Scholar]
  22. Jüttner U, Peck H, and Christopher M (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4): 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016   [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamalahmadi M and Mellat-Parast M (2016). Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1): 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1088971   [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim YH and Schoenherr T (2018). The effects of supply chain integration on the cost efficiency of contract manufacturing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(3): 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12168   [Google Scholar]
  25. Li G, Fan H, Lee PK, and Cheng TCE (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021   [Google Scholar]
  26. Mani V, Delgado C, Hazen BT, and Patel P (2017). Mitigating supply chain risk via sustainability using big data analytics: Evidence from the manufacturing supply chain. Sustainability, 9(4): 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040608   [Google Scholar]
  27. Nooraie SV and Parast MM (2015). A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 161: 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.024   [Google Scholar]
  28. Scheibe KP and Blackhurst J (2018). Supply chain disruption propagation: A systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2): 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123   [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheffi Y (2001). Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806262   [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheffi Y (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press Books, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheffi Y and Rice Jr JB (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1): 41-48.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Vilko J and Lättilä L (2018). Analyzing supply chain vulnerability through simulation. In: Khojasteh Y (Eds.), Supply chain risk management: 107-122. Springer, Singapore, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4106-8_7   [Google Scholar]
  33. Waal DA, Mroueh M, and Schiavo L (2017). Analyzing performance in the UAE manufacturing industry using the high performance organization framework. Middle East Journal of Business, 12(1): 3-11.   [Google Scholar]
  34. Wagner SM and Neshat N (2010). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1): 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.007   [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu DD and Olson DL (2010). A review of enterprise risk management in supply chain. Kybernetes, 39: 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011043198   [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang C, Liu X, Jin JG, and Liu Y (2016). A stochastic ANP-GCE approach for vulnerability assessment in the water supply system with uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1): 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2501651   [Google Scholar]