Volume 7, Issue 10 (October 2020), Pages: 69-77

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Impact of the different level of transformational leadership on the employees’ performance: A case study of the ADNOC

 Author(s): Hasan Karam *, R. Tasmin

 Affiliation(s):

 Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6493-8899

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.10.007

 Abstract:

The organizational performance is directly dependent on the employee’s performance, which is directly associated with the leadership and employee’s relationship. Therefore, leadership shows a crucial role in the performing enhancement of the workers. There are different leadership styles that have different effects on employees in various organizations. Similarly, there are different levels of leadership. In this article, comprehensive data is collected from 638 employees to evaluate the role of leadership and its impact on various dimensions of the employees’ performance, e.g., motivations, appraisal, job security, various level of leadership support, etc. The results revealed that in UAE, there is a close tie between the employees’ performance and leadership. The employees’ motivation, performance, and job security are highly dependent on leadership relations with the employees. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Leadership style, Oil and gas companies, Employees' motivation, Employees’ performance

 Article History: Received 16 January 2020, Received in revised form 12 May 2020, Accepted 17 June 2020

 Acknowledgment:

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Karam H and Tasmin R (2020). Impact of the different level of transformational leadership on the employees’ performance: A case study of the ADNOC. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(10): 69-77

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 15 Fig. 16 Fig. 17

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 

----------------------------------------------

 References (24)

1. Al-Dhaqm A, Abd Razak S, Othman SH, Nagdi A, and Ali A (2016b). A generic database forensic investigation process model. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-11): 45-57. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9190   [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, and Othman SH (2018). Model derivation system to manage database forensic investigation domain knowledge. In the IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security, IEEE, Langkawi, Malaysia: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS.2018.8631468   [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, Othman SH, Choo KKR, Glisson WB, Ali A, and Abrar M (2017a). CDBFIP: Common database forensic investigation processes for internet of things. IEEE Access, 5: 24401-24416. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2762693   [Google Scholar]
4. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak S, Othman SH, Ngadi A, Ahmed MN, and Mohammed AA (2017b). Development and validation of a database forensic metamodel (DBFM). PloS One, 12(2): e0170793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170793   [Google Scholar] PMid:28146585 PMCid:PMC5287479
5. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak SA, and Othman SH (2015). Common investigation process model for database forensic investiga-tion discipline. In the 1^st ICRIL-International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 297-300.   [Google Scholar]
6. Al-Dhaqm A, Razak SA, Othman SH, Ali A, and Ngadi A (2016a). Conceptual investigation process model for managing database forensic investigation knowledge. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 12(4): 386-394. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.12.2377   [Google Scholar]
7. Al-Dhaqm AMR, Othman SH, Razak SA, and Ngadi A (2014). Towards adapting metamodelling technique for database forensics investigation domain. In the International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies, IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBAST.2014.7013142   [Google Scholar]
8. Ali A, Razak SA, Othman SH, and Mohammed A (2015). Towards adapting metamodeling approach for the mobile forensics investigation domain. In the 1^st International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 364-368.   [Google Scholar]
9. Ali A, Razak SA, Othman SH, and Mohammed A (2017b). Extraction of common concepts for the mobile forensics domain. In the International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Johor Bahru, Malaysia: 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_16   [Google Scholar]
10. Ali A, Razak SA, Othman SH, Mohammed A, and Saeed F (2017a). A metamodel for mobile forensics investigation domain. PloS One, 12(4): e0176223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176223   [Google Scholar] PMid:28445486 PMCid:PMC5433730
11. Berry ML (2010). Predicting turnover intent: examining the effects of employee engagement, compensation fairness, job satisfaction, and age. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Tennessee, USA.   [Google Scholar]
12. Bordens KS and Abbott BB (2018). Research design and methods: A process approach. Mayfield Pub., Mountain View, USA.   [Google Scholar]
13. Brower RE and Balch BV (2005). Transformational leadership and decision making in schools. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
14. Creswell J and Poth C (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. 4^th Edition, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
15. Creswell JW (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2^nd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
16. De Vaus D (2001). Research design in social research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
17. Hofstede G (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
18. Mone EM and London M (2018). Employee engagement through effective performance management: A practical guide for managers. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626529   [Google Scholar]
19. Ngadi M, Al-Dhaqm R, and Mohammed A (2012). Detection and prevention of malicious activities on RDBMS relational database management systems. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 3(9): 1-10.   [Google Scholar]
20. O'leary Z (2004). The essential guide to doing research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
21. Sreejesh S and Mohapatra S (2013). Mixed method research design: An application in consumer-brand relationships (CBR). Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany.   [Google Scholar]
22. Supian SR, Ismail IA, Sidi F, and Omar Z (2018). Relationship between human resource practices and talent retention among professional and management staff of a public university in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7): 834-862. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4423   [Google Scholar]
23. Theisohn T and Lopes C (2013). Ownership leadership and transformation: Can we do better for capacity development. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315065687   [Google Scholar]
24. Tomlinson CA and McTighe J (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD, Alexandria, USA.   [Google Scholar]