Volume 6, Issue 4 (April 2019), Pages: 75-80

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Theoretical and experimental analysis of the main girder double girder bridge cranes

 Author(s): Muamer Delić *, Nedim Pervan, Mirsad Čolić, Elmedin Mešić

 Affiliation(s):

 Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-4995

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.04.009

 Abstract:

When designing cranes, it is necessary to analyze the value of the contraction of the construction, as well as the values of the maximum stresses occurring in the crane construction. Precisely, in this paper, the theoretical and experimental analysis of the contraction and stress condition of the main crane girder in accordance with the standard of crane-general design has been done. The analysis of mechanical appearance in the main girder of the crane is carried out on the basis of the analytic solution of equilibrium equations. The results obtained by the theoretical analysis of the main crane girder were verified by experimental tests on the model of a double girder bridge crane with a capacity of 250 kg. At the end of the work an analysis of the obtained results was performed, on the basis of which specified conclusions were made. 

 © 2019 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Bridge crane, Main girder of crane, Theoretical analysis of girder, Experimental analysis

 Article History: Received 20 November 2018, Received in revised form 11 February 2019, Accepted 11 February 2019

 Acknowledgement:

No Acknowledgement

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest:  The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

  Delić M, Pervan N, and Čolić M et al. (2019). Theoretical and experimental analysis of the main girder double girder bridge cranes. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(4): 75-80

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12

 Tables

 Table 1

----------------------------------------------

 References (19) 

1. Alkin C, Imrak CE, and Kocabas H (2005). Solid modeling and finite element analysis of an overhead crane bridge. Acta Polytechnica, 45(3): 61-67.    [Google Scholar]
2. CEN (2016a). EN 13001−1: Cranes- general design- Part 1: General principles and requirements. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.    [Google Scholar]
3. CEN (2016b). EN 13001−2: Cranes- general design- Part 2: Load actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.    [Google Scholar]
4. CEN (2016c). EN 13001−3.1: Cranes- general design- Part 3.1: Limit states and proof of competence of steel structure. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.    [Google Scholar]
5. Chmurawa M and Gąska D (2005). Modeling of bridge cranes for dimensioning needs of their load-carrying structures. The International Journal of Ingenium, Cracow–Glasgow–Radom, 4: 409-414.    [Google Scholar]
6. Delić M, Colic M, Mešic E, and Pervan N (2017). Analytical calculation and FEM analysis main girder double girder bridge crane. TEM Journal, 6(1): 48-52.    [Google Scholar]
7. Gaska D and Pypno C (2011). Strength and elastic stability of cranes in aspect of new and old design standards. Mechanics, 17(3): 226-231. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.17.3.495    [Google Scholar]
8. Gašić V, Zrnić N, and Petković Z (2012). Dynamic responses of a gantry crane structure due to an acceleration moving mass. In the International Conference on Material Handling, Construction and Logistics, MHCL, 12(XX): 113-118.    [Google Scholar]
9. Gašić V, Zrnić N, Obradović A, and Bošnjak S (2011). Consideration of moving oscillator problem in dynamic responses of bridge cranes. FME Transactions, 39(1): 17-24.    [Google Scholar]
10. Hellmut E (1996). Die Hebezeuge-band II- Winden und krane, Friedr. Vieweg i sohn, Braunschweig, Germany.    [Google Scholar]
11. Mešić A, Čolić M, Mešić E, and Pervan N (2016). Stress analysis of chain links in different operating conditions. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 5(12): 43-49.    [Google Scholar]
12. Mešić E, Avdić VA, and Pervan N (2015). Numerical and experimental stress analysis of an external. Folia Medica Facultatis Medicinae Universitatis Saraeviensis, 50(1): 52-58.    [Google Scholar]
13. Mešić E, Vahid, A, Nedim P, and Nedžad R (2014). Finite element analysis and experimental testing of stiffness of the Sarafix external fixator. In the 25^th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, Procedia Engineering, 100: 1598-1607.    [Google Scholar]
14. Oguamanam DCD, Hansen JS, and Heppler GR (2001). Dynamics of a three-dimensional overhead crane system. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 242(3): 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3375    [Google Scholar]
15. Patel PR and Patel VK (2013). A review on structural analysis of overhead crane girder using FEA technique. Evaluation, 2(4): 41-44.    [Google Scholar]
16. Pervan N, Mešić E, and Čolić M (2017). Stress analysis of external fixator based on stainless steel and composite material. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(1): 189-199.    [Google Scholar]
17. Repčić N and Čolić M (2008). Transportna sredstva. Mašinski Fakultet, Belgrade, Serbia.    [Google Scholar]
18. Sowa L, Saternus Z, and Kubiak M (2017). Numerical modelling of mechanical phenomena in the gantry crane beam. Procedia Engineering, 177: 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.193    [Google Scholar]
19. Wu JJ (2006). Finite element analysis and vibration testing of a three-dimensional crane structure. Measurement, 39(8): 740-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2006.03.002    [Google Scholar]