International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 6, Issue 12 (December 2019), Pages: 82-91

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Sociological perspective on the well-being of the elderly Muslim women in Malaysia

 Author(s): Novel Lyndon 1, *, Mohd. Nor Shahizan Ali 1, Mohd. Fuad Mat Jali 1, Azlina Abdullah 1, Nor Aisah Areff 2

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia
 2Department of Anthropology and Sociology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-8247

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.12.010

 Abstract:

There are a growing number of studies on the aging society in Malaysia. However, many of those employ quantitative approaches, which yield important data but concentrate more on the experts’ standpoint for which researchers’ perspectives possibly outweigh the importance of the subjects’. Therefore, this study was an attempt to analyses the meaning of well-being from the viewpoint of elderly Muslim women. The findings revealed that the elders perceived well-being as having the opportunities to learn and to teach. Apart from that, the ability to perform good deeds and to avoid any wrongdoings as ordered by Allah meant that they had gone through well-being. They also believed that they had achieved well-being for which to some elders experiencing happiness and peacefulness as the means to identify it. Finally, in viewing the meaning of well-being to elders, religion could be the most significant dimension. As the subject of religion could be identified throughout the thesis, it shows how religion becomes the part and parcel of elders’ personal and collective lived experiences. Subsequently, activity theory rooted in symbolic interactionism and gerotranscendence seemed to be more applicable in explaining elders’ interpretations of well-being. In conclusion, the construction of their worldview on well-being would give a better understanding of elders’ future needs in the local socio-cultural environment. Thus, the efforts in policy planning and implementation could be expected to be more attentive to and effective for the Malaysian elders’ benefits. 

 © 2019 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Malay Muslim women, Elderly, Abductive research strategy, Well-Being, Sociology

 Article History: Received 5 May 2019, Received in revised form 5 October 2019, Accepted 7 October 2019

 Acknowledgement:

It is appreciated and thankful to the SK-2017-002 Research Grant, led by Professor Dr Fuad Mat Jali, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for the financial support given to the high impact of publication project. This article is part of a research grant EP-2017-034 MPOB-UKM Endowment. Thank you to the Center for Research and Instrumentation Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for their continued support in conducting research and publications.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest:  The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Lyndon N, Ali MNS, and Jali MFM et al. (2019). Sociological perspective on the well-being of the elderly Muslim women in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(12): 82-91

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1

 Tables

 Table 1

----------------------------------------------

 References (56) 

  1. Adams KB, Leibbrandt S, and Moon H (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, 31(4): 683-712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001091   [Google Scholar]
  2. Alley DE, Putney NM, Rice M, and Bengtson VL (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(5): 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq053   [Google Scholar] PMid:20675614 PMCid:PMC2920947
  3. An JY, An K, O'Connor L, and Wexler S (2008). Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and perceived health status among elder Korean women: Focus on living arrangements. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 19(2): 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659607313070   [Google Scholar] PMid:18362207
  4. Areff NA and Lyndon N (2015). Meanings of old age to the elderly in pondok living arrangement in Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4): 32-38. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p32   [Google Scholar]
  5. Asis MMB, Domingo L, Knodel J, and Mehta K (1995). Living arrangements in four Asian countries: A comparative perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10(1-2): 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972034   [Google Scholar] PMid:24389774
  6. Bengtson VL, Putney NM, and Johnson M (2005). The problem of theory in gerontology today. In: Bengtson VL, Coleman PG, and Kirkwood TB (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing: 3-20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610714.003   [Google Scholar] PMid:15618268
  7. Blaikie N (2000). Designing social science research: The logic of anticipation. Polity, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Blaikie N (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge. Polity, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Böckerman P, Johansson E, and Saarni SI (2012). Institutionalization and subjective wellbeing for old-age individuals: Is life really miserable in care homes? Ageing and Society, 32(7): 1176-1192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1100081X   [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradshaw SA, Playford ED, and Riazi A (2012). Living well in care homes: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Age and Ageing, 41(4): 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs069   [Google Scholar] PMid:22678747
  11. Buys LR (2001). Life in a retirement village: Implications for contact with community and village friends. Gerontology, 47(1): 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052771   [Google Scholar] PMid:11244293
  12. Chan A (2005). Aging in southeast and East Asia: Issues and policy directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20(4): 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9006-2   [Google Scholar] PMid:17072767
  13. Chmiel M, Brunner M, Martin R, and Schalke D (2012). Revisiting the structure of subjective well-being in middle-aged adults. Social Indicators Research, 106(1): 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9796-7   [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbin J and Strauss A (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, USA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153   [Google Scholar]
  15. Deeg DJH (2007). Health and quality of life. In: Mollenkopf H and Walker A (Eds.), Quality of life in old Age: 195–213. International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_12   [Google Scholar]
  16. Dupuis SL and Alzheimer M (2008). Leisure and ageing well. World Leisure Journal, 50(2): 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2008.9674538   [Google Scholar]
  17. Durand YM (2007). Living arrangements of the elderly in Bangkok, Thailand: Impacts of low fertility, life-courses, and non-marriage. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  18. EPU (2010). Tenth Malaysia plan 2011-2015. Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia. Available online at: https://bit.ly/33DVYD2
  19. EPU (2013). Malaysian well-being report 2013. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. Available online at: https://bit.ly/33DkLHy
  20. Everard KM (1999). The relationship between reasons for activity and older adult well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 18(3): 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489901800304   [Google Scholar]
  21. Gee EM (2000). Living arrangements and quality of life among Chinese Canadian elders. Social Indicators Research, 51(3): 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007036122117   [Google Scholar]
  22. George LK (2010). Still happy after all these years: Research frontiers on subjective well-being in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3): 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq006   [Google Scholar] PMid:20233742
  23. Glaser K (1997). The living arrangements of elderly people. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 7(01): 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959259897000075   [Google Scholar]
  24. Grant BC (2007). Retirement villages: More than enclaves for the aged. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 31(2): 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v31n02_03   [Google Scholar]
  25. Halleröd B and Seldén D (2013). The multi-dimensional characteristics of wellbeing: How different aspects of wellbeing interact and do not interact with each other. Social Indicators Research, 113(3): 807-825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0115-8   [Google Scholar]
  26. Hamid ASA (1993). Malaysia's vision 2020, understanding the concept: Implications and challenges. Pelanduk Publications, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.   [Google Scholar]
  27. Ismail Z, Wan-Ibrahim WA, Mahmud Z, Hamjah SH, Jemain R, Baharuddin E, and Kusrin ZM (2012). An alternative living arrangement for older Malaysian. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(8): 1568-1572.   [Google Scholar]
  28. Jacobs J (1974). An ethnographic study of a retirement setting. The Gerontologist, 14(6): 483-487. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/14.6.483   [Google Scholar] PMid:4470542
  29. Jeng WS (2000). Intergenerational relations, living arrangements, and well-being of the elderly in Taiwan. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirby SE, Coleman PG, and Daley D (2004). Spirituality and well-being in frail and nonfrail older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(3): P123-P129. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.3.P123   [Google Scholar] PMid:15118015
  31. Lam RC (2006). Contradictions between traditional Chinese values and the actual performance: A study of the caregiving roles of the modern sandwich generation in Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(2): 299-313.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Longino Jr CF and Kart CS (1982). Explicating activity theory: A formal replication. Journal of Gerontology, 37(6): 713-722. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/37.6.713   [Google Scholar] PMid:7130646
  33. Lu L, Kao SF, and Hsieh YH (2010). Positive attitudes toward older people and well-being among Chinese community older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(5): 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464809343289   [Google Scholar]
  34. Lyndon N, Razak N, Azima AM, Junaidi AB, and Sivapalan S (2015a). Empowerment of the bidayuh rural community oil palm smallholders: A case study in Serian district, Sarawak, Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p55   [Google Scholar]
  35. Lyndon N, Zakaria H, Azima AM, Rosniza AC, and Sarmila MS (2015b). Cultural and language identity of the Thesaban Takbai Malay ethnic, southern Thailand: A phenomenological analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p11   [Google Scholar]
  36. Maddox GL (1963). Activity and morale: A longitudinal study of selected elderly subjects. Social Forces, 42(2): 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/42.2.195   [Google Scholar]
  37. Mason J (2002). Qualitative researching. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  38. McCann M, Donnelly M, and O'Reilly D (2011). Living arrangements, relationship to people in the household and admission to care homes for older people. Age and Ageing, 40(3): 358-363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr031   [Google Scholar] PMid:21427114
  39. Menec VH (2003). The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6-year longitudinal study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2): S74-S82. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.2.S74   [Google Scholar] PMid:12646596
  40. Molloy DW, Bédard M, Pedlar D, and Lever JA (1999). Institutionalization in cognitively-impaired older individuals: A longitudinal study. Clinical Gerontologist, 20(2): 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v20n02_02   [Google Scholar]
  41. Morrow-Howell N, Hinterlong J, Rozario PA, and Tang F (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3): S137-S145. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.3.S137   [Google Scholar] PMid:12730314
  42. Musick MA, Traphagan JW, Koeing HG, and Larson DB (2000). Spirituality in physical health and aging. Journal of Adult Development, 7(2): 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009523722920   [Google Scholar]
  43. Nihtilä E and Martikainen P (2008). Why older people living with a spouse are less likely to be institutionalized: The role of socioeconomic factors and health characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 36(1): 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494807086421   [Google Scholar] PMid:18426783
  44. Ong FS, Phillips DR, and Hamid TA (2009). Ageing in Malaysia: Progress and prospects. In: Fu Th and Hughes R (Eds.), Ageing in East Asia: Challenges and policies for the twenty-first century: 138-160. Routledge, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  45. Park NS (2009). The relationship of social engagement to psychological well-being of older adults in assisted living facilities. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(4): 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464808328606   [Google Scholar]
  46. Perkins MM, Ball MM, Whittington FJ, and Hollingsworth C (2012). Relational autonomy in assisted living: A focus on diverse care settings for older adults. Journal of Aging studies, 26(2): 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.001   [Google Scholar] PMid:22707852 PMCid:PMC3374405
  47. Reyes GE (2001). Four main theories of development: Modernization, dependency, world-systems and globalization. Nómadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 4(2): 109-124.   [Google Scholar]
  48. Rowe JW and Kahn RL (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4): 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433   [Google Scholar] PMid:9279031
  49. Sereny MD and Gu D (2011). Living arrangement concordance and its association with self-rated health among institutionalized and community-residing older adults in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 26(3): 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-011-9145-y   [Google Scholar] PMid:21484315
  50. Su YP and Ferraro KF (1997). Social relations and health assessments among older people: Do the effects of integration and social contributions vary cross-culturally? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(1): S27-S36. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.1.S27   [Google Scholar] PMid:9008679
  51. Tan PC, Ng ST, Tey NP, and Halimah A (1999). Evaluating programme needs of older persons in Malaysia. University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.   [Google Scholar]
  52. Tohit N, Browning CJ, and Radermacher H (2012). We want a peaceful life here and hereafter: Healthy ageing perspectives of older Malays in Malaysia. Ageing and Society, 32(3): 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000316   [Google Scholar]
  53. UNDP (2013). Human development report 2013 the rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. United Nations Development Program, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  54. UNDP (2014). Human development report 2014: Malaysia. United Nations Development Program, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  55. WHO (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.   [Google Scholar]
  56. Wong YS and Verbrugge LM (2009). Living alone: Elderly Chinese Singaporeans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 24(3): 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-008-9081-7   [Google Scholar] PMid:18825493