International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 5, Issue 3 (March 2018), Pages: 26-31

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: The effects of BSC and organizational culture towards employees’ attitude in Malaysian government-link company (GLC)

 Author(s): Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi 1, *, Tezza Adriansyah Anwar 2, H. Obsatar Sinaga 3

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Business and Law, International University of Malaya-Wales, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
 2Business and Management Faculty, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia
 3Social and Political Science Faculty, Padjajaran University, Bandung, Indonesia

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.03.004

 Full Text - PDF          XML

 Abstract:

The objective of this research was to investigate the impact of the organizational culture towards the employees’ attitude derived from the usage of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) perspectives as a performance management system in Government-link Company (GLC). The usage of performance management system has been the major issues in GLC that merit intention due to the constraint in change management and public policies changes. The employees’ attitude derived from organizational culture’s impact is being evaluated to understand the effect towards the overall performance of the employees and the organization. Studies performed by scholars about measuring and managing performance would be enriched by studying the employee attitude element. The critical part of the research is to measure the level of job satisfaction and organizational commitment from the employees that would determine the performance has been affected by organizational culture. The impact of organizational culture affecting performance was found to be the main issue that merits attention from this research. The implication of this research would benefits the organization in terms of employees’ effectiveness and the pervasiveness of the implementation of performance metric and organizational culture in Malaysian Government-link service organization. 

 © 2017 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Organizational performance, Employee attitude, Performance management, System balanced-score card, Organizational culture

 Article History: Received 9 August 2017, Received in revised form 30 December 2017, Accepted 30 December 2017

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.03.004

 Citation:

 Saudi MHM, Anwar TA, and Sinaga HO (2018). The effects of BSC and organizational culture towards employees’ attitude in Malaysian government-link company (GLC). International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(3): 26-31

 Permanent Link:

 http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/2018/V5I3/Saudi.html

----------------------------------------------

 References (31)

  1. Ashkenas R, Ulrich D, Jick T, and Kerr S (2002). The boundaryless organisation: Breaking the chains of organisational structure. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. 
  2. Azhar R (2009). Adoption of performance measurement among Malaysian Public Sector. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.     
  3. Bourne MCS and Bourne PA (2007). Balanced scorecard (Instant manager). Hodder Education, London, UK.     
  4. Cavana RY, Delahaye BL, and Sekaran U (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley and Sons, Australia.     
  5. Chow CW, Kato Y, and Merchant KA (1996). The use of organizational controls and their effects on data manipulation and management myopia: A Japan vs US comparison. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2-3): 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00030-5 
  6. Cummings T and Worley C (2001). Organisation development and change. 7th Edition, South Western College Publishing, Mason, Ohio, USA.     
  7. DuBrin A (2005). Fundamental of organisational behaviour. 3rd Edition, South-Western Publishing Co., Nashville, Tennessee, USA. PMid:16050651     
  8. Gordon G and Christensen E (1993). Industry influence on the relationships between management culture and performance. Paper presented at the National Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.     
  9. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, and Tatham RL (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.     
  10. Kaplan RS and Norton DP (2001). The strategy-focused organization. Strategy and Leadership, 29(3): 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/sl.2001.26129cab.002 
  11. Kitchenham B and Pfleeger SL (2002). Principles of survey research part4: Questionnaire evaluation. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 27(3): 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/638574.638580 
  12. Kotter JP and Heskett JL (2008). Corporate culture and Performanc. Free Press, New York, USA.     
  13. Kreitner R and Kinicki A (1992). Organisational behaviour. Richard d Irwin, New York, USA.     
  14. Lau HC and Idris MA (2001). The soft foundation of the critical success factors on TQM implementation in Malaysia. The TQM Magazine, 13(1): 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780110379480 
  15. Lincoln JR and Kalleberg AL (1990). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organisation and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.     
  16. Maxwell SE and Delaney HD (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (Vol. 1). Psychology Press, Hove, UK.     
  17. Meyer JP and Allen NJ (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1): 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z 
  18. Moorhead G and Griffin R (1992). Organisational behavior. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, USA. PMCid:PMC1293496     
  19. Morgan GA, Gliner JA, and Harmon RJ (1999). Quantitative research approaches. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(12): 1595-1597. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199912000-00022  PMid:10596261 
  20. Mowday RT, Porter LW, and Steers RM (2013). Employee organisation linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover'. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PMCid:PMC3695803     
  21. Neuman LW (2002). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson, London, UK. PMCid:PMC120112     
  22. Othman O (2001). Perakaunan Sektor Awam. McGraw Hill, New York, USA. PMCid:PMC384890     
  23. Saari LM and Judge TA (2004). Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 43(4): 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20032 
  24. Saudi MHM (2014). The effect of performance management system and organizational culture towards employee attitude in Malaysian government statutory body: A case study on MARA. DBA Dissertation, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia.     
  25. Saudi MHM (2016). The effect of organizational culture: The case of Malaysian service organization from the balanced scorecard perspectives. International Journal of Business and Law, 10(2): 41-47.     
  26. Sekaran U and Bougie R (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.     
  27. Siddique NA (2006). Public management reform in Malaysia: Recent initiatives and experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4): 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669185 
  28. Siehl C and Martin J (1988). Measuring organisational culture: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods. In: Jones MO, Moore MD, and Snyder RC (Eds.), Inside organisations: Understanding the human dimension: 79-103. Sage Publications, London, UK.     
  29. Steers RM (1989). Organizational science in a global environment. In: Yg. Osigweh CAB (Ed.), Organizational science abroad: 293-304. Springer, New Mexico, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0912-1_14 
  30. Ward S, Pearson C, and Entrekin L (2002). Chinese cultural values and the Asian meltdown. International Journal of Social Economics, 29(3): 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290210417098 
  31. Yusof AA (2003). Performance appraisal: Issues, challenges and prospects. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.